To come in
Speech therapy portal
  • Educational program "School of Future Student"
  • Abstract directly - educational activities for cognitive development in the preparatory group agent: "We are future schoolchildren" conversation we are future schools
  • Peddortion. Africzunova E.V. Educator of the preparatory group "Scarlet flower" - the presentation of the conversation we are future schoolchildren
  • Approximate complex - thematic planning Preparatory group January
  • Promising plan in the preparatory group
  • Approximate complex-thematic planning for GEF in the preparatory group for October
  • Which party advocated the proletarian revolution. Proletarian Socialist Revolution. Tips do not dare to turn into government organizations

    Which party advocated the proletarian revolution. Proletarian Socialist Revolution. Tips do not dare to turn into government organizations


    Proletarian Socialist Revolution - the violent overthrowing of the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie and the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat in order to destroy the capitalist method of production and the organization of a new, socialist production method. The classic example of the proletarian revolution is the Great October Socialist Revolution. The characteristic features of the proletarian revolution, in contrast to the bourgeois show, showed I. V. Stalin in his work "To issues of Leninism":

    1) The bourgeois revolution is usually beginning with more or less ready-made forms of capitalist defendant, growing and matured to an open revolution in the depths of the feudal society, while the proletarian revolution begins in the absence, or almost in the absence of ready-made forms of socialist defendant.

    2) The main task of the bourgeois revolution is reduced to grab the power and bring it into line with a cash bourgeois economy, while the main task of the proletarian revolution is reduced to ensuring that the power, to build a new, socialist economy.

    3) The bourgeois revolution is usually completed by the seizure of power, whereas for the proletarian revolution the seizure of power is only its beginning, and power is used as a lever to restructure the old economy and the organization of the new one.

    4) The bourgeois revolution is limited to replacing one exploitative group in the power of another exploiter group, in view of which it does not need a layer of the old state car, while the proletarian revolution removes everything and all sorts of exploratory groups and puts the leader of all workers in the operators, the class of proletarians , in view of which it can not do without a smoke of the old state car and replacing it new.

    5) the bourgeois revolution cannot be rally around the bourgeoisie for any long period of millions of workers and operated masses precisely because they are workers and operated, while the proletarian revolution may have to tie them with a proletariat in a long-term union, precisely as workers and operated, If she wants to fulfill its main task of strengthening the power of the proletariat and the construction of a co-socialist economy. " On the basis of a deep scientific analysis of the patterns of development of capitalism, Marxism came to the conclusion about the inevitability of the proletarian revolution.

    History shows that there were no such cases so that the dying classes would voluntarily leave the scene and inferior their domination to other classes. The founders of Marxism substantiated the tasks of the proletariat in the socialist revolution, proved the need for a broom of the bourgeois state machine and establishing the dictatorship of the proletariat. In the 40s of the last century, based on the conditions of domination capitalism, when capitalism developed more or less smoothly on the upstream line, Marx and Engels believed that the victory of the Proletarian revolution is possible only with a joint speech of the proletariat of all advanced countries or at least most of the civilized countries . The victory of the proletarian revolution in one country Marx and Engels considered impossible. And it was correct for the era of the Domonopolistic Capitalism.

    Creatively developing Marxism, Lenin in 1915-1916. In his works "On the slogan of the United States of Europe" and "military program of the Proletarian Revolution" gave a new completed theory of the proletarian, socialist revolution, the theory of the possibility of victory of socialism initially in several or even in one, separately taken, capitalist country and not. "| The possibilities of victory of socialism simultaneously in all countries due to the unevenness of their economic and political development in the era of imperialism. To this theory, Lenin came on the basis of the scientific analysis of the new stage of development of capitalism - imperialism. Even during the first Russian revolution, in 1905, in the book "" (see) Lenin revealed the originality of the bourgeois-democratic revolution in the era of imperialism, justifies the theory of the outrage of the bourgeois-democratic revolution in the Socialist revolution.

    Already then, Lenin created the foundations of the new theory of the socialist revolution. "According to this theory of hegemony, the proletariat in the bourgeois revolution under the alliance of the proletariat and the peasantry should be erected into the hegemony of the proletariat in the socialist revolution under the alliance of the proletariat and the remaining workers and operated masses, and the democratic dictatorship of the proletariat and the peasantry should prepare the soil for the socialist dictatorship of the proletariat." In this new theory of the socialist revolution, created by Lenin in 1905, there was also no direct conclusion about the possibility of victory of socialism initially in one, separately taken, country. But in it, as indicated in the "short course of history of the WCP (b)", already contained all or almost all the basic elements necessary in order to make this output.

    Lenin made him in 1915. Lenin showed that in the era of imperialism, contradictions characteristic of capitalism are increasingly sharpened. Strengthening the neb in capitalist countries leads to an increase in the revolutionary crisis in them, to the exacerbation of the contradiction between labor and capital. The contradictions between the imperialist countries and the colonies are exacerbated. Strengthening the unevenness of economic and political development in conditions of imperialism deepens and exacerbates the contradictions between the imperialist countries, which makes the periodic wars "and markets for sources of raw materials, for the redistribution of the world inevitable. These wars weaken the forces of imperialism and create the possibility of a breakthrough of the imperialist front in its weak link.

    Lenin raised the question about the national liberation movement in colonial and affiliates, as the reserve of the proletarian revolution, pushed the possibility and inevitability of the connection of the proletarian revolution in capitalist countries with the national liberation movement of colonial and dependent countries into a single revolutionary front against imperialism.

    The Great October Socialist Revolution was a complete confirmation of the new Lenin theory of the socialist revolution. In the new conditions, in the face of the struggle for the victory of socialism in the USSR and increasingly aggravating the contradictions of imperialism, the Marxist-Leninist doctrine on the proletarian revolution developed and enriched V. Stalin. The Communist Party exposed the counter-revolutionary installations of socialism enemies about the impossibility of victory of socialism in the USSR.

    The doctrine of Marxism-Leninism about the proletarian revolution, the strategy and tactics of the Communist Party in the revolution is the most acute theoretical weapons of communist parties in the struggle for socialism throughout the world.

    The proletarian revolution, which won the USSR, was the first stage of the World Socialist Revolution. After the Second World War from the system of imperialism, a number of countries fell, which thanks to victory Soviet Union Above the fascist Germany and imperialist Japan and the help of the Soviet people rose on the path of people, (see) and the construction of socialism. The great victory over the internal forces of counter-revolution and foreign imperialists won the Chinese people. The experience of the Soviet Union, the successes of socialism inspire the peoples of the whole world on the struggle against imperialism, for peace, democracy, socialism.

    The economic basis of the proletarian revolution.

    As Marks and Engels showed, the contradiction between the productive forces and capitalist industrial relations, which causes the social revolution of the proletariat, has a contradiction between the social character of production and the private-capitalist form of assignment. This main contradiction of capitalism gives rise to a number of other contradictions and finds its expression primarily in the growing antagonism between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie.

    This contradiction was inherent in capitalism already at its first stage, when he was still going on the upstream line of development. The contradictions of capitalism deepened, extremely aggravated and were supplemented with new contradictions when he converted into imperialism and began to develop on the downlink.

    The trend of capitalist accumulation opened by Marx, leading to the increasing concentration on one pole of the richness society, on the other - poverty, is manifested with exceptional force under imperialism. Capital Magcasses hold in their hands the main mass of production tools in all capitalist countries and destroy the productive forces and in peaceful and in war time. Working masses are increasingly feeling the oppression of imperialism, the omnipotence of capitalist trusts and syndicates, banks and the financial oligarchy.

    Under conditions of imperialism, there is not only relative, but also the absolute impoverishment of the working class. The aggravation of the contradiction between labor and capital leads to the inevitable revolutionary explosion, to the socialist revolution of the proletariat.

    "Either spend on the mercy of capital, the lady in the old way and go down, or throwing new weapons - this is the question of imperialism in front of the millionth masses of the proletariat. Imperialism brings the working class to the revolution "(I.V.Stalin, Op., T.6, p. 72.).

    The contradictions who have already knew the Domonopolistic capitalism, imperialism added a new acute contradiction between financial groups, imperialist powers. Imperialism is characterized by the export of capital to sources of raw materials and, therefore, the struggle for the monopoly mastering by these sources, for other people's territory. The struggle between the various groups of capitalists for the monopoly possession of the sources of raw materials and the spheres of capital investment in conditions when the world turned out to be already divided between a handful of imperialist powers, made the periodic wars for the redistribution of the world alone. This leads to a mutual weakening of the imperialists, to the weakening of capitalism and approaches the need for the Proletarian revolution.



    Imperialism strengthened and brought to the extreme limits of the contradiction between the hands of the dominant "civilized" nations and between the hundreds of millions of colonial and dependent peoples. Imperialism means a brutal, unbearable blowing over the population of colonies, even more cruel and inhuman than in the metropolis. "Imperialism is the most disadvantage and the most inhuman oppression of hundreds of millions of the population of extensive colonies and dependent countries. The squeezing of super-profits is the purpose of this operation and this oppression "(ibid., P. 73). As a result, the revolutionary proletariat in the fight against imperialism has an ally represented by workers of colonies and dependent countries.

    The exacerbation of old contradictions of capitalism and the emergence of new contradictions in the era of imperialism means that the contradiction between productive forces and production relations with imperialism received further development. For imperialism, the extreme aggravation of antagonism between the social character of production and the private form of assignment is characterized. This antagonism now finds its expression and in an in-depth conflict between the productive forces and the national imperialist framework of their development. "From the point of view of economic, teaches Comrade Stalin, the current conflicts and military clashes of capitalist groups among themselves, as well as the struggle of the proletariat with the class of capitalists, have their own conflict conflict of the current productive forces with the national imperialist framework of their development and with capitalist assignment forms. The imperialist frames and the capitalist shape are listened, they do not give to develop the productive forces "(I. V. Stalin, Op., T.5, p. 109 - 110).



    The historical role of the Socialist Revolution.

    The elimination of the specified conflict is possible only by abolishing private ownership of the means of production, which is the basis of capitalist assignment and imperialist robbery. If, therefore, in all previous revolutions, it was about replacing one form of private ownership of the other: slave-owned - feudal, and feudal - capitalist, the socialist revolution is intended to eliminate any private property for the means of production and to approve social, socialist property in its place. . Thus, the socialist revolution is designed to eliminate any exploitation of some people. This is the historical meaning of the proletarian, socialist revolution and its indigenous difference from all other revolutions. Therefore, the proletarian revolution is a radical turn in world history.

    The Great October Socialist Revolution in Russia fully confirmed the truth of Marxism-Leninism about the meaning of the proletarian revolution. It led to the destruction of private ownership of the means of production, to the elimination of the exploitative classes and all types of exploitation and oppression, to the statement of the socialist production method, based on public domain of production by production.

    The proletarian revolution differs from other revolutions with its great creative mission. Neither one of the previous revolutions did not stand the tasks of creating a new production method. The bourgeois economy has developed and contemplated spontaneously in the depths of the feudal society, because the bourgeois property and the feudal property of the same type at their own basis.

    Socialist ownership of the means of production can not be spontaneously established in a society based on private ownership of the means of production, on exploitation and oppression of workers. In the depths of the bourgeois society, only the material basis for the inevitable offensive of socialism is created. This material basis grows in the form of new productive forces and public utilities and creates the possibility and need to translate funds to the property of society. But the transformation of this possibility in reality occurs not spontaneously, but has its prerequisite for the socialist revolution, the conquest of the dictatorship of the proletariat and the expropriation of expropriators. If the bourgeois revolution cares for the finished forms of the capitalist economy and its tasks are reduced only to destroy and sleep all the ways of the former society, "the proletarian revolution begins in the absence, or almost in the absence of ready forms of socialist defendant" (I. V. Stalin , Op., T.8, p. 21), and its task is to build a new, socialist economy on the basis of proletarian dictatorship. This implies the most important difference between the proletarian revolution, formulated by a friend Stalin the following words: "The bourgeois revolution is usually completed by the seizure of power, whereas for the proletarian revolution the seizure of power is only its beginning, and power is used as a lever to restructure the old economy and the organization of the new" (ibid) .

    Unlike the bourgeois revolution, the mission of which is completely exhausted by the destruction of the old one, the proletarian revolution is not limited to the destruction of the old, it is a great creative task, it is designed to organize the life of millions of people in a new way, on the basis of socialism.

    The bourgeoisie and its reformist whistles stubbornly say that the working class, destroying old orders, is not able to create something new that people cannot do without landowners and capitalists. This slander of modern slave owners and their Nimitov - right-wing socialists, leiborists, profburocrocks are divided into the great life fact of the existence of socialism built by the Soviet people under the leadership of the Bolshevik Party, on the presenters of the great scientific and organizational genius of Lenin in Stalin. Comrade Stalin, appreciating the world-historical importance to build socialism in the USSR, noted that the main summary of this victory is that the working class of our country "has proven in fact that it is quite capable not only to destroy the old system, but also to build a new one , Socialist system and, at the same time, which does not know either crises nor unemployment (I. V. Stalin, Leninism issues, ed. 11, p. 610).

    What is the characteristic features of the proletarian revolution, in contrast to the bourgeois revolution?

    The difference between the revolution of the proletarian and the bourgeois revolution could be reduced to five main points.

    1) The bourgeois revolution is usually beginning with more or less ready-made forms of capitalist defendant, growing and matured to an open revolution in the depths of the feudal society, while the proletarian revolution begins in the absence, or almost in the absence of ready-made forms of socialist defendant.

    2) The main task of the bourgeois revolution is reduced to grab the power and bring it into line with a cash bourgeois economy, while the main task of the proletarian revolution is reduced to ensuring that the power, to build a new, socialist economy.

    3) bourgeois revolution complete Usually the seizure of power, whereas for the proletarian revolution the seizure of power is only her beginning And power is used as a lever to restructure the old economy and the organization of the new one.

    4) The bourgeois revolution is limited to replacing one exploitative group in the power of another exploiter group, in view of which it does not need a layer of an old state machine, while the proletarian revolution removes everything and all sorts of exploratory groups and puts the leader of all workers and exploited, the class of proletarians , in view of which it can not do without a smoke of the old state car and replacing it new.

    5) the bourgeois revolution cannot be rally around the bourgeoisie for any long period of millions of workers and operated masses precisely because they are workers and operated, while the proletarian revolution may have to tie them with a proletariat in a long-term union, precisely as workers and operated, If she wants to fulfill its main task of strengthening the power of the proletariat and the construction of a new, socialist economy.

    Here are some basic positions of Lenin on this subject:

    "One of the main differences," Lenin says, "the bourgeois and socialist revolution is that for the bourgeois revolution growing from feudalism, new economic organizations are gradually being created in the depths of the old building, which change gradually all parties to the feudal society. Before the bourgeois revolution there was only one task - to sleep, discard, destroy all the ways of the previous society. Performing this task, every bourgeois revolution performs everything that it is required: it strengthens the growth of capitalism.

    In a completely different position, the Socialist revolution. The more retarded the country, which had to, by virtue of the zigzags of history, began to begin a socialist revolution, the more difficult for her the transition from old capitalist relations to socialist. Here, new, unheard of tasks are added to the tasks of destruction - organizational "(see t. XXII, p. 315).


    "If folk creativity, Lenin continues, - the Russian revolution, who passed through the great experience of 1905, did not create the Soviets back in February 1917, then in no case could they take power in October, as success depended only from Cash is ready organizational forms Movement engulfed millions. There were advice on this finished form, and therefore, in the political area we were waiting for those brilliant successes, then a solid triumphal march we survived, because the new form of political power was ready, and we had only a few decrees to turn the power of tips from that embryonic state in which It was in the first months of the revolution, the form legally recognized, established in the Russian state, to the Russian Soviet Republic "(see t. XXII, p. 315).

    "They still remained," says Lenin, "two gigantic difficulties of the task, whose decision in no way could be the triumphal procession, which was in the first months of our revolution" (see ibid., P. 315).

    "First, these were the tasks of the internal organization facing all the socialist revolution. The difference between the socialist revolution from the bourgeois is that in the second case there are ready-made forms of capitalist relations, and the Soviet power - proletarian - these ready-made relationship does not receive, if not to take the most developed forms of capitalism, which in essence covered the small top industry and very little Another affected agriculture. The organization of accounting, control over the largest enterprises, the transformation of the entire state economic mechanism into a single large car, to the economic body, working so that hundreds of millions of people married one plan, which is the gigantic organizational task that fell on our shoulders. According to the current working conditions, it in no way allowed the decision on the "Hurray", just as we managed to solve the tasks of the Civil War "(see ibid., P. 316).

    "The second of the gigantic difficulties ... - international question. If we have so easily coped with Kerensky gangs, if you have created the power so easily, if we have done a decree on the socialization of the Earth, work control, - if we got so passenger, then just because happily established conditions for a short moment Credit us from international imperialism. International imperialism with all the power of its capital, with its highly organized military equipment, representing the real force, the real fortress of international capital, in no case under no circumstances can be seated next to Soviet Republic And according to its objective position and on the economic interests of the capitalist class, which was embodied in it, could not because of trade relations, international financial relations. Here the conflict is inevitable. Here the greatest difficulty The Russian revolution, its greatest historical problem: the need to solve the tasks of international, the need to cause an international revolution "(see t. XXII, p. 317).

    These are the inner character and the main meaning of the proletarian revolution.

    Is it possible to do such a root restructuring of old, bourgeois orders without a violent revolution, without the dictatorship of the proletariat?

    It is clear that it is impossible. It is peaceful to think that this revolution can be done peacefully in the framework of the bourgeois democracy, adapted to the domination of the bourgeoisie, means either going crazy and to lose normal human concepts, or renounce roughly and openly from the proletarian revolution.

    This provision must be emphasized with the greatest strength and categorical that we are dealing with the proletarian revolution that won so far in one country, which is surrounded by hostile capitalist countries and the bourgeoisie of which cannot but support international capital.

    That is why Lenin says that:

    "The liberation of the oppressed class is impossible not only without a violent revolution, but also runningthat apparatus of state power, which is a dominant class created "(see t. XXI, p. 373).

    "Let first, while maintaining private property, i.e., when maintaining power and the neot of capital, the majority of the population speaks for the batch of proletariat, - only then it can and should take power" - so small-bourgeois democrats say, actual servants of the bourgeoisie, Creating ourselves "Socialists" · (see t. XXIV, p. 647).

    "" Let the revolutionary proletariat will overthrow the bourgeoisie, will break the cage of capital, it will break the bourgeois state apparatus, then the proletariat who won the victory will be able to quickly attract the sympathy and support of most workers to the unpole masters, satisfying them at the expense of the exploiters. "- speak We "(see ibid.)

    "To conquer the majority of the population to your side," Lenin continues, "the proletariat must, first, to overthrow the bourgeoisie and seize state power into their hands; He must, secondly, introduce Soviet powerBy smoldhing the old state apparatus, which immediately undermines the domination, the authority, the influence of the bourgeoisie and the petty-bourgeois agreements in the medium of the unpoletarian workers. He must, thirdly, finally The effect of bourgeoisie and fine-bourgeois agreements among most Unpoletarian Workers Mass revolutionary exercising their economic needs at the expense OPERATORS "(see ibid., p. 641).

    These are characteristic signs of the proletarian revolution.

    What are therefore, in connection with this, the main features of the dictatorship of the proletariat, if it is recognized that the dictatorship of the proletariat is the main content of the proletarian revolution?

    Here is the most general definition of the dictatorship of the proletariat given by Lenin:

    "The dictatorship of the proletariat is not an end of the class struggle, but there is a continuation of it in new forms. The dictatorship of the proletariat is the class struggle of the victorious and taking into their hands the political power of the proletariat against the defeated, but not destroyed, who did not disappear, who did not cease to resist, against the strengthened resistance of the bourgeoisie "(see t. XXIV, p. 311).

    Objecting against the mixing of the dictatorship of the proletariat with the power of "nationwide", "community", with the authorities of Neklasna, Lenin says:

    "The class that took political domination in his hands, took it, conscious that he takes him one·. This is concluded in the concept of the dictatorship of the proletariat. This concept then only makes sense when one class knows that he one takes political power to himself and does not deceive himself or other conversations about "nationwide, generally collecting, all the people of consecrated" power "(see t. XXVI, page 286).

    This does not mean, however, that the power of one class, the class of proletarians, who does not share and cannot share it with other classes, does not need its goals in assistance, in the Union with the workers and the exploited masses of other classes. On the contrary. This power, the power of one class can be approved and carried out to the end only by the special form of the Union between the class of proletarians and the working masses of small-bourgeois classes, primarily the working masses of the peasantry.

    What is this special form of the Union, what is it? Does this union do not contradict with the workers' masses of other, non-propellant classes of the idea of \u200b\u200bthe dictatorship of one class?

    It consists of this special form of the Union, in the fact that the leading force of this union is the proletariat. It consists of this special form of the Union, in the fact that the head of the state, the head in the system of the dictatorship of the proletariat is one Party, Parishing of the Proletariat, Communist Party, which does not divide and not Can share manuals with other parties.

    As you can see, the contradiction here only visible, apparent.

    "The dictatorship of the proletariat, says Lenin, - there is a special form of class union Between the proletariat, the avant-garde of the working people, and the numerous non-deplets layers of workers (small bourgeoisie, smallholders, the peasantry, intelligentsia, etc.), or by most of them, the union against capital, the Union in order to complete the overthrow of capital, the complete suppression of the resistance of the bourgeoisie and restoration attempts From her part, the Union for the purposes of final creation and strengthening of socialism. This is a special type of the Union, which develops in a special situation, precisely in the situation of a mad civil war, this is the union of solid supporters of socialism with his allies, sometimes with "neutral" (then from the Union Agreement is becoming a neutrality agreement), union between unequal economically, politically, socially, spiritually classes " (See t. XXIV, p. 311).

    In one of his instructive reports, Kamenev, half ameloning with this kind of understanding the dictatorship of the proletariat, says:

    "Dictatorship do not eat Union of one class with another. "

    I think that Kamenev has here in mind, above all, one place from my brochure "October Revolution and Tactics of Russian Communists", which says:

    "The dictatorship of the proletariat is not a simple government asshist," skillfully "" selected "by the caring hand of the" experienced strategist "and" reasonably supported "on certain layers of the population. The dictatorship of the proletariat is the class union of the proletariat and the workers of the masses of the peasantry for the overthrow of capital, for the final victory of socialism, provided that the governing force of this union is the proletariat. "

    I fully support this wording of the dictatorship of the proletariat, for I think that it is entirely and completely coincides with the gluable wording of Lenin.

    I argue that Kamenev's statement that "dictatorship do not eat The union of one class with another ", given in such a unconditional form, has nothing to do with the Lenin theory of the dictatorship of the proletariat.

    I argue that only people who have not understood the meaning of the idea of \u200b\u200bthe bow, the ideas of the proletariat and the peasantry, ideas hegemony proletariat in this union.

    So only people who have not understood the Lenin thesis that are:

    "Only an agreement with the peasantry May save the socialist revolution in Russia, until the revolution has come in other countries "(see t. XXVI, p. 238).

    So only people who have not understood Lenin's positions that:

    "The highest principle of dictatorship - It is to maintain the union of the proletariat with the peasantry so that it can keep the leading role and state power "(see the Gam, p. 460).

    Noting one of the most important goals of the dictatorship, the purpose of suppressing the exploiters, Lenin says:

    Scientific concept Dictatorship means nothing more than anything unlimited, no laws, no absolutely reluctant, directly on violence based power "(see t. XXV, p. 441).

    "Dictatorship means - accept this time forever note, the Lord Cadets, - an unlimited, based on force, and not on the law, power. During the 1st War, every winning power can only be dictatorship "(see t. XXV, p. 436).

    But violence, of course, does not exhaust the dictatorship of the proletariat, although there is no dictatorship without violence.

    "Dictatorship," Lenin says, "means not only violence, although it is impossible without violence, it also means the labor organization is higher than the previous organization" (see t. XXIV, p. 305).

    "The dictatorship of the proletariat ... There is not only violence over the exploiters and not mostly violence. The economic basis of this revolutionary violence, the key to his vitality and success is that the proletariat represents and carries out a higher type of public organization of labor, compared with capitalism. In this essence. In this source of force and the key to the inevitable complete victory of communism "(see t. XXIV, p. 335-336).

    "The main essence of it (i.e. dictatorships. I. Art.) In the organization and disciplination of the advanced detachment of workers, his avant-garde, his sole leader, proletariat. His goal is to create socialism, destroy the division of society into classes, make all members of the Society by workers, take away the soil in any exploitation of man by man. This goal cannot be done immediately, it requires quite a long transition period from capitalism to socialism - and because the reorganization of production is a difficult thing, and because it takes time for indigenous changes in all areas of life, and because the huge strength of the habit to the finely bourgeois and bourgeois commander can be overcome only in long, persistent struggle. Therefore, Marx and indicates the whole period of the dictatorship of the proletariat, as a period of transition from capitalism to socialism "(see the same, p. 314).

    Such are the characteristic features of the proletariat dictatorship.

    Hence the three main side of the dictatorship of the proletariat.

    1) The use of the power of the proletariat to suppress the exploiters, for the defense of the country, to strengthen links with the proletarians of other countries, for the development and victory of the revolution in all countries.

    2) the use of the power of the proletariat for the final separation of workers and the exploited masses from the bourgeoisie to strengthen the union of the proletariat with these masses, to involve these masses in the case of socialist construction, for the state leadership by these masses from the proletariat.

    3) the use of the power of the proletariat for the organization of socialism, to destroy classes, to move to society without classes, to a socialist society.

    The proletarian dictatorship is the connection of all these three sides. None of these parties can be nominated as only the characteristic sign of the dictatorship of the proletariat, and, on the contrary, is quite lack of at least one of these Signs so that the dictatorship of the proletariat ceased to be dictatorship in the situation of the capitalist environment. Therefore, none of these three-parties can be excluded without danger to distort the concept of the dictatorship of the proletariat. Only all of these three sides taken together give us a complete and completed concept of the dictatorship of the proletariat.

    The dictatorship of the proletariat has its own periods, its own special forms, a variety of work methods. During the period of the civil war, the violent side of the dictatorship is especially hiking. But from this it does not even follow that during the period of the Civil War there is no construction work. Without construction work, it is impossible to conduct civil war. During the construction of socialism, on the contrary, the peaceful, organizational, cultural work of dictatorship, revolutionary legality, etc., is not particularly worked in the eyes, and because of this, it does not at all that the violent side of the dictatorship disappeared or can disappear during the construction period. Suppression, army and other organizations are needed now, at the time of construction, as well as during the period of the Civil War. Without the presence of these organs, any secured construction work of dictatorship is impossible. We should not forget that the revolution won until only in one country. We should not forget that while there is a capitalist environment, there will be a danger of intervention with all the consequences that arise from this risk.

    I. Proletarian revolution

    see Socialist Revolution.

    II. Proletarian Revolution ("Proletarian Revolution",)

    historical magazine; Published in Moscow in 1921-41 [in 1921-28 - body of the St. Petersburg State University of the Central Committee of the CCP (b), in 1928-31 - the Institute of Lenin under the Central Committee of the CPSU (b), in 1933-41 - Institute of Marx - Engels - Lenin at the Central Committee of the CPSU ( b)]. 132 rooms came out. The editors in different years were M. S. Olminsky, S. I. Kathers, M. A. Savelyev, V. G. Kninin, V. G. Sirin, M. B. Mitin. Circulation is 5 to 35 thousand copies, the frequency of release has changed. Published research articles, documents and memoirs on the history of the labor movement, the Communist Party, October revolution 1917 I. Civil War 1918-20, on prominent leaders of the party, working and social democratic movement, criticism and bibliography, etc.

    LIT: "Proletarian Revolution." Systematic and alphabetical pointer. 1921-1929, [L.], 1930.

    • - ul. , begins with ul. Pervomayskaya and goes to the CCT "Cosmos" ...

      Ekaterinburg (Encyclopedia)

    • - a radical revolution, a deep qualitative change in the development of nature, knowledge, society; The scientific revolution is a change in the foundations of the worldview, the emergence of a new paradigm, the emergence of a new level of thinking ...

      The start of modern natural science

    • - 16-17 centuries. - a sharp increase in commodity prices as a result of falling the cost of gold and silver ...
    • - violent coup in the socio-political and spiritual life of the people, who has the purpose of the extent of the existing order and replacing his new ...

      Cossack Dictionary

    • -. The revolutionary process of transition from ancient slave owner ...

      Dictionary of Antiquity

    • - 1) Slow rotation, circle, imperceptible shift ...

      Alternative culture. Encyclopedia

    • - Native coup; A sharp, jump-shaped transition to a different qualitative state - the manifestation of one of the most important patterns of the development of natural, social and mental processes ...

      Big psychological encyclopedia

    • - the revolution overthrowing the existing structure associated with the transition of state power from one manual to another and able to entail a radical restructuring of public and ...

      Political science. Vocabulary.

    • - Monthly critical bibliography. The magazine was published in Moscow in 1932-40. 108 rooms came out. In the Departments "Socio-Economic Science", "Part.-Mass Lit-Ra", "History" was published criticism ...

      Soviet historical encyclopedia

    • - See Socialist Revolution ...

      Soviet historical encyclopedia

    • - Monthly critical-bibliographic magazine, which was published in Moscow in 1932-40 ...
    • Great Soviet Encyclopedia

    • - I, the proletarian revolution, see the Socialist Revolution. II proletarian revolution historical journal; published in Moscow in 1921-41. 132 rooms came out ...

      Great Soviet Encyclopedia

    • - Work V. I. Lenin, in which the Marxist doctrine of the socialist revolution and the dictatorship of the proletariat develops, expose the opportunistic views of one of the leaders of the 2nd International to ....

      Great Soviet Encyclopedia

    • - "" - Historical Journal, Moscow, 1921-41, 132 rooms ...

      Big Encyclopedic Dictionary

    • - Review. Iron. Right bank of the Neva in Leningrad - St. Petersburg. Syndalovsky, 2002, 150 ...

      Big Dictionary Russian sayings

    "Proletarian Revolution" in books

    Chapter 18. Proletarian Revolution of Baku People in the Parity Party

    From the book Stalin. Path to power Author Emelyanov Yuri Vasilyevich

    Chapter 18. The Proletarian Revolution of Baku People in the Parlet Party is quite obvious that in the "Baku period" Stalin demonstrated the ability to not only perform the instructions of the Central Party Guide, but also to solve the problems that had a fundamental importance for

    The proletarian revolution and the need for transitional period from capitalism to socialism.

    From the book political economy Author Ostrovstanov Konstantin Vasilyevich

    The proletarian revolution and the need for transitional period from capitalism to socialism. The entire course of the development of the capitalist method of production and class struggle in the bourgeois society inevitably leads to a revolutionary replacement of capitalism by socialism. As it was

    5. Proletarian revolution

    From the book Instinct and social behavior Author Fet Abram Ilyich

    5. The proletarian revolution Paris workers made a new element in this revolution, who changed the course of world history: they turned the political struggle for power to the class struggle for social justice. On February 25, at the insistence of Louis, the Provisional Government

    Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution

    From the book of the Soviet Union in local wars and conflicts Author Lavrene Sergey

    The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution of 1966 marked the tragic period in the history of the People's Republic of China. In August of that year, the Resolution of the CCP Central Committee on the "Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution" was published, the purpose of which was to "defeat those shut-off

    Proletarian revolution in the GDR!

    From the book of the author

    Proletarian revolution in the GDR! Since September 1989, the revengery bourgeoisie FRG supports, relying on huge financial investments, television channels and radio stations, anti-communist propaganda in the GDR. Mandela's grouping argues that "the real

    Chapter 9. Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution. RESULTS OF THE PERIOD MAO

    From the book is hidden Tibet. Independence and occupation history Author Kuzmin Sergey Lvovich

    Chapter 9. Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution. The results of the period of Mao The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution In 1966, initiated and led Mao Zedong personally: "The fire of the cultural revolution was made up." (1184) By the end of his life, he considered her one of his main merit. Purpose

    Proletarian revolution

    BSE.

    "Proletarian Revolution"

    From the book Big Soviet Encyclopedia (AP) BSE.

    "Proletarian Revolution and Rengate Kautsky"

    From the book Big Soviet Encyclopedia (AP) BSE.

    "Book and Proletarian Revolution"

    From the book Big Soviet Encyclopedia (KN) author BSE.

    From the work "Proletarian Revolution and Rengate Kautsky" (1918)

    From the book of the author

    From the work "Proletarian Revolution and Rengage Kautsky" (1918) ... If you do not mock a common sense and above the story, it is clear that there is no need to talk about "clean democracy", while there are various classes, and you can only talk about class democracy. (In brackets to say

    8. Proletarian revolution?

    From the book Nomenclature. Dominant class of the Soviet Union Author Veslensky Mikhail Sergeevich

    8. Proletarian revolution? In the Smolny Palace in Leningrad, where the Leningrad Oblocity and the CPSU Hall now are located, the visitor is conducted on high corridors in a large hall with white columns and a spacious scene. In a number of movies and in countless executed canvases

    From the book of the problem of the international proletarian revolution. The main questions of the proletarian revolution Author Trotsky Lev Davidovich

    The right of national self-determination and proletarian revolution

    From the book between imperialism and revolution Author Trotsky Lev Davidovich

    The right of national self-determination and the proletarian revolution "Union powers do not intend to retreat from the great principle of self-determination of small peoples. Only then they will refuse him from him when they will have to agree with the fact that any temporary

    V. Proletarian Revolution and Communist International

    From the book of the problem of the international proletarian revolution. Communist International Author Trotsky Lev Davidovich

    V. Proletarian Revolution and Communist International Civil War around the world put in order of day. The Soviet government is the banner. Capitalism proleded the overwhelming masses of humanity. Imperialism knocked out these masses from equilibrium and led them

    Communists and most anarchists.

    Notes


    Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

    Watch what is a "proletarian revolution" in other dictionaries:

      Historical Journal, Moscow, 1921 41 (in 1921 28 Organ, in 1928, 31 Institute V. I. Lenin, in 1933 41 ICEL), 132 rooms ... Big Encyclopedic Dictionary

      - "Proletarian Revolution", Historical Journal, Moscow, 1921 41 (in 1921 28 Organ, in 1928, 31 Institute V. I. Lenin, in 1933 41 IMEL), 132 rooms ... encyclopedic Dictionary

      East. The magazine, which was published in Moscow in 1921 41 (in 1921 28, the ENTART authority of the Central Committee of the CPSU (b), in 1928 31 In Ta Lenin under the Central Committee of the CPSU (b), in 1933 41 IN TA Marks Engels Lenin under the Central Committee of the CPSU (b)). 132 rooms came out. Editors P. R. In different years were M. S. Olminsky, ... ...

      I, the proletarian revolution, see the Socialist Revolution. II Proletarian Revolution ("Proletarian Revolution",) Historical Journal; Published in Moscow in 1921 41 [in 1921 28 Organ of the St. Pair of the Central Committee of the CPSU (b), in 1928 31 of the Lenin Institute at ... ... Great Soviet Encyclopedia

      See Socialist Revolution ... Soviet historical encyclopedia

      Historical Journal, Moscow, 1921 41 (in 1921 28 Organ, in 1928, 31 Institute V.I. Lenin, in 1933 41 ICEL), 132 rooms. Articles and publications on the history of the labor movement and the Bolshevik Party ... encyclopedic Dictionary

      This term also has other meanings, see the proletarian revolution. Proletarian Revolution Specialization: Historical Journal Periodicity: different Language: Russian address of the editors: Moscow Main Res ... Wikipedia

      - ("Proletarian Revolution and Rengate Kautsky",) Work V. I. Lenin, in which the Marxist doctrine of the socialist revolution and the dictatorship of the proletariat develops, expose the opportunistic views of one of the leaders of 2nd ... ... Great Soviet Encyclopedia

      "Book and Proletarian Revolution" - "Book and Proletarian Revolution", monthly magazine of Marxist Leninsky Critics and Bibliography; It was published in the publishing house "True" (Moscow) in 1932 - 1940 (instead of the magazine "Book and Revolution", which was released in 1929 - 1930). Placed ... ... Literary Encyclopedic Dictionary

    Books

    • Proletarian revolution and Rengate Kautsky, V.I. Lenin. Reproduced in the original author's spelling of the edition of 1935 (publishing house "Moscow") ...