A complex sentence with the Union or. SSP with dividing unions. Complete proposals with connecting unions
Live Journal
Facebook.
Twitter.Complex sentences - These are sentences consisting of several simple.
The main means of communication of simple proposals in complex are intonation, alliances (writing and subordinates) and allied words (relative pronouns and primegable).
Depending on the means of communication, complex offers are divided into allied and nessuzny. Union proposals are divided into complexed and complexed.
Complexed Offers (SSP) are complex proposals in which simple proposals are associated with each other intonation and writing unions.
Types of complex proposals for the nature of the Union and the meaning
| Type of SP. | Unions | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| 1. connecting unions (Connecting relationships). | AND; Yes (in meaning and); no no; Yes, and; also; also; not only but. |
Opened the door, and the air from the yard rolled into the kitchen (POUST). |
| 2. Certain offers S. interconnected unions (Compact relationship). | BUT; but; Yes (in meaning but); but (in meaning but); but; but; And that; not that; and not that; Same particle (in the meaning of the Union but); particle only (in the meaning of the Union but). |
Ivan Petrovich gone, and I stayed (Leskov). |
| 3. Certain offers S. separate alliances (dividing relationship). | Or; or; not that ..., not that; then ..., then; Either ..., either. |
Either fish eat either stranded (proverb). |
Note!
1) Writing alliances can associate not only parts of a complex proposal, but also homogeneous members. Their distinction is especially important for the alignment of punctuation marks. Therefore, when analyzing, be sure to highlight the grammatical foundations to determine the type of sentence (simple homogeneous members or a complex proposal).
Wed: From the smoke hole, a man and a lot of large sturgeon walked (Sand) - a simple sentence with uniformly tamed; Money ladies on the road and the helicopter can cause (Sands) - a complex proposal.
2) Writing unions usually occupy a place at the beginning of the second part (the second simple sentence).
In some way Danube serves as a border, but he serves and dear People to each other (Sands).
The exclusion is the unions, too, also, union particles, only. They necessarily occupy or can take a seat in the middle of the second part (the second simple sentence).
My sister and I cried, mother also cried (Aksakov); Comrades treated him disliked, the soldiers loved truly (Kuprin).
Therefore, when parsing, such complex offers are often confused with non-union complex suggestions.
3) Double Union is not only ..., but also expresses gradation relations and in school textbooks are attributed to the connecting unions. Very often, when analyzing, only his second part is taken into account ( but also) And mistakenly refer to the oppositional unions. In order not to make a mistake, try replacing this double union union and.
Wed: Language should be not only clear or simple, but also language must be good (L. Tolstoy). - Language must be understandable or common, and language must be good.
4) By meaning, complex offers are very diverse. Often they are close to the meaning to complex proposals.
Wed: You will leave - and it will become dark (Shefner). - If you leave, it will become dark; I did not eat anything, but I did not feel hunger (Tenryakov). - Although I did not eat anything, I did not feel hunger.
However, when parsing is not taken into account, this is not the specific value, and the value due to the type of writing union (connecting, interpreting, separation).
Notes. In some textbooks and manuals, complex suggestions include complex suggestions with explanatory unions. that is, namely, eg: The Board authorized him to speed up the work, that is, in other words, he emphasized himself to this (Kurpros); Bird flights produced as an adaptive instinctive act, namely: it gives birds ability to avoid Unfavorable conditions for winter (Sands). Other researchers relate them to complex proposals or allocate in an independent type of complex proposals. Part of the proposals with particles only, refer to non-union proposals.
Complex Proposition (SSP)
Plan
1. The concept of SSP. SSP classification by potential quantitative composition: Complex proposals for open and closed structure (V.A. Beloshapkova).
2. Traditional SSP classification in accordance with semantic groups of unions.
2.1. SSP with connecting unions of an open and closed structure.
2.2. SNP with separation unions.
2.3. SPP with interpretation unions.
2.4. SPP with connecting unions.
2.5. NGN with explanatory unions.
2.6. Graduation SSP.
3. Ploban signs in the SSP.
Complex offer(SSP) is a complex proposal, parts of which are associated with writing alliances and, as a rule, equal to grammatically and in meaning. Writing alliances are not included in any of them, are not members of the sentence.
All SSPs are divided into two types: open and closed structure.
Parts of complex offers open The structures are an unclosed series, they are situated at the same name. Communication means are self-connecting and separation unions that can be repeated. Such proposals may have an unlimited number of parts and they can always be protected. For example: yes Somewhere shouted a night bird ...Let's try to continue this offer. Pinkly splashing water yes somewhere shouted the night bird, yes In the bushes she moved something white(Korolenko). In the SSP of the open structure there may be more than two predicative units (PE): That Long bitter her neck hooked off suddenly that From the ears, malicious earrings will cut by force; that In fragile snow, a wet shoe will get bogged down with a sweet leg; that She will relieve a handkerchief ... (P.).
In suggestions closed The structures of the part are a closed row, these are always two parts, structurally and semantically interdependent, related. The second part of them closes a number and does not imply the presence of the third. For example: The need relates to people but Wealth share them; He wanted to say something to him but fat man already disappeared (). Means of communication - non-refining unions: but, but, however, and; not only butand etc.
For alliances and in value, complexity is all of the six groups.
3.1. Complex proposals with connecting unions.
List of connecting unions (single and repeated): and, yes, too, also as well; As ... so, yes ... yes, and ... and.
Certain offers S. connectingunions may have an open and closed structure.
2.1.1. SSP Open Structure
Such SSPs reflect different semantic relations between NE ( predicative e.ditnitsa). Unions and (and ... and), nor ... nor, yes (yes ... yes).
In such SSP, predicative parts express the connecting relationship; They are reported about:
but) simultaneous events and phenomena: N. [calún not growing between númi] n. [grass not green] (I. Turgenev); And [ slnzesvétit], and [ grade green], and [ ptústep Weight]. As a rule, in this case, the relationship between parts of the SSP is ȧhtsemanty, that is, they can act as independent simple sentences: (see the first sentence) Kalina does not grow between them. The grass does not green.
b) about them following each other, sequences: [UPLIDE-Three Crushed kȧpl rain], and [suddenly glittered Moulnia] (I. Goncharov ). [A door across the street in a brightly lit store slapped], and [out of it appeared togenerate] (M. Bulgakov). This value can be specified by the words then, then, following.
Connecting SSP of the open structure (homogeneous composition) can consist of two, three and more.
There may have a general secondary member of the proposal or the general apparent part-determinants (in this case, the comma between the parts of the SSP is not set):
In the distance Dark and strict groves (I. Bunin): Union and uninvited monastery Darkand twisted Groves are strict.Determinant (General Member of SSP) in the distanceit clearly shows that uniform facts are listed.
(When the sun rose), [dew dried]and [Grass grilled].Subordinate clause When the sun rose Refers immediately to both neither connected relationships, so before the union and the comma is not put.
The simultaneity and sequence of listed facts is often emphasized by compliance of the species-time forms of the faranged in different pro (as a rule, the faugibles are expressed by the verbs of one species): At the same moment [above Sopnia soared Immediately dozens of rockets] and [mad patter foured machine guns] (Gray). In both parts of the SSP, the verbs-faded perfect species. Common sentence sentence (time circumstance) at the same momenthe emphasizes the relationship of simultaneity and prevents the decimal setting between ne.
2.1.2. SSP closed structure
Predicative parts are connected here by non-repeating alliances and, yes, too, also, which are accompanied by specification with the specifics of values. They consist only from two ne.Relationships between parts of the SSP are sysencent, that is, one sentence within the meaning is associated with the other, especially if there are specifies words.
Stand out six types SSP closed structure.
1. Proposals with meaning consequences - withdrawal, conditions, consequences, result, rapid change of events. These specimen words are often used in them therefore, therefore, because therefore, it means(specitizers - words and phrases that are connected to the union and clarify its value). The second part reports the result, a consequence, withdrawing from the content of the first part: We are starving, and[so] Mother finally decided to send me and sister to the village(V. Cavery). He is now not the fiance you, you are outsiders, and thereforeyou can not live in the same house (A. Ostrovsky). Summate Create Relevant Conditions and You Delete Life Plants(Conditional relations: if you can create conditions, then extend ...). The artist raised the bow - and everything instantly smalklo.
2. SSP S. value value:the second part has the character of adding to what is said in the first part. In the second part, words concreters are often used - anaphoric pronouns and adverbs (stand in early 2 ne), pointing to the face, a sign, subject, the situation mentioned in the first part of the SSP: Now the street is completely dark, and this is It was beautiful(V. Cavery). At the beginning of 2, there may also be synonyms or repeat the same word as in 1 part of the SSP: Introduced new graphics, and this is an innovation Significantly increased productivity.
3. SSP S. connecting and promptwith Soyuz AND: parts contradict each other according to real content. Note words are possible yet, nevertheless, anyway, despite this, neverthelessetc.: a) Germans reached Moscow, and still They were driving(V. Nekrasov). b) I tried to cut her out, and nothing came out.
4. SSP S. identified value(Unions, too, also), parts of which report two similar, identical events taking place at the same time: People were greatly hungry, horses alsoneeded rest(Arsenyev). A strange old man spoke very long, the sounds of his voice also I amazed me(Turgenev).
5. NGN with connecting additional value (unions Yes, and):the second part contains additional information. In the role of native speakers protrude in addition, also, moreover, moreover, and under.: Compare you with men, yes yet And the old resentment will remember(Sholokhov).
6. NGN with connecting restrictive value. The event of the second part limits the completeness of the event mentioned in the first part. Specification words justand under.: The same courtyard, all the same laughter and only you lack a little bit (L. Oshanin). On the body it was not visible damage, and only Small scratch on the temple (A.N. Tolstoy). The words onlycan perform the function of unions.
Complex proposals with separation unions.
List of dividing unions: or, or, and then, not that, and not that; or ... or, or ... either; Lee ... Lee, Lee ... Or, at least ... at least that ... what, whether ... or; And even, not ... so, if (and) not ... then; not that ... not, or even ... either; then ... then;analogs of Unions : and maybe (be), and may (be) and; Maybe (to be) ... may (be), maybe (be) ...:
These are the proposals of the open structure. The main relationship between nepo in the SSP with separation unions is the relationship of mutually exclusion and alternations:
1. Relations consistence:unions or, or, not that ... not that; either ... either: Or pan, or disappeared. Then winter, then Spring, then fall(K. Simonov). Ile Plague me pickering me, Ile Moroz Okey, Ile Il in the forehead Barrbum will shift a disabled person(A. Pushkin). I will not return to you anymore, maybe I'll stay with you(City 312).
2. In dividing SSP with meaning alternatingit is reported about the sequence of replacing each other events that are not combined in time: That Sun dimly glitters, thatcloud black hanging(Nekrasov).
Tasks for self-analysis (lecture check)
Exercise 1.Give the characteristic by the complex proposals of the open structure from their structure and semantics. Specify the shades of values. For example: Either you are stupid, or you cheat me.This SSP consists of 2 ne: 1 ne You're stupid and 2 ne You're lying.Formal Communication - Repeating Separation Union or either.Between parts of the SSP relationship of mutually computiation.
1. For the night, the sea calmed down a little, the wind verse, and the fog began to dissipate.
2. Let or he leaves, or we will leave.
3. None of the insects are discovered in the grass, no bird will stick on the tree.
4. Pines diverged, and Margarita quietly drove into the air to the chalk cliff (Bulg.)
Task 2. Describe the SSP with the Union and, indicating the structural type (open or closed structure), the structural-semantic discharge (relationship between parts of the SSP) and the shades of the value (semantic varieties). For example: Shells rareand bullets whistled, / and loudly rocked the machine gun, / and the girl Masha inprovisible overcoats / fighters of all in the attack leads.This is a SSP open structure, as there are more than 2 more and you can add others. Structural and semantic discharge: NGN with self-connecting relationships. Tint value - the value of simultaneity.
1. He was taken apart from him, and he settled in the fortress (Lerm.).
2. The night was windy, rainy, and it contributed to success.
3. Silence reigned around the circle, and only the water rustled on the carpaths.
4. One jump - and the lion is already on the head of the buffalo.
5. The river is completely listed by the fin, and, therefore, it was possible to freely go from one shore to another.
6. Some fur coats were given six, and the cheapest of them, according to Grandma, cost three hundred rubles (A.P. Chekhov)
7. I have a wife, two girls, and moreover, the wife is a lady unhealthy (A.P. Chekhov)
Task number 3. Make a complete syntactic parse of SSP.
Sample parsing.
And smells of a sluggish grass, from Inea Crystal, and, distinguishable, the star shines sad (V. Tushmanova)
1. For the purpose of the statement - narrative.
2. According to emotional color - non-promotional.
3. Complex, because Consists of 2 ne: 1 ne: AND[smells of sluggish grass, from Inea Crystal]. 2 Pe. - I.[distinguishable barely star shines sad]. There are interconnected union and, therefore, this is a complex proposal (SSP). Union and connecting, so in the very general Relationships in the SSP can be described as connecting. Parts of the SSP are an unclosed series, that is, the proposal of the open structure: can be continued by attaching other pro with the same grammatical value (translucent). Relationship auto-semantic. Situations reflected in PE think of speaking as simultaneous. The grammatical means of expressing simultaneity are the form of non-verbs. Veda verbs-faded: smells - glitters.
Scheme: And, and.
4. Analysis of each ne.
1 ne: And smells of a sluggish grass, from Inea Crystal.
grass smells
b) full.
c) Completed: Grass (what?) sloggy
from Inea Crystal, pronounced adjective with dependent words.
2 ne: and, distinguishable barely, the star shines sad.
a) Two-part offer. Subject starexpressed by the name noun in I.P. Simple verbal faithful blovetexpressed by the hidden verb. BP. Nesov.
b) full.
c) Common: Star (what?) sad - a consistent definition expressed by adjective.
d) complicated by a common separate definition distinguished hard, pronounced involved in turnover.
Suggestion suggestions
1. I don't want to think about anything, or they roam thoughts and memories, muddy and unclear, like a dream (A. Serafimovich).
2. A shock short - and the ball at the gate.
2.3. Complex proposals with interpretation unions.
Complex proposals for closed structure from propateunions: a, but yes(= but), however, but, but yes(in meaning but).
According to the characteristics of the structure and by major grammatical values, all complex proposals with oppositional unions are divided into two groups: 1) comparable and 2) interpreting proposals.
Comparative relationscharacteristic for SSP with interchangeable unions a (meanwhile),(Union-particle), where they are compared in something in something phenomena, but with all nursing they do not cancel each other, and, as if coexist: The need relates to people butwealth share them(Need relatives to people, wealth same They share them). Comrades belonged to it disliked, the comrades loved(Kuprin). Often, relations are based on antithesis (antonymy). Hence the presence in the predicative parts of the comparative proposals of typed lexical elements - compared the words of one thematic group.
The most common among such proposals are suggestions with the most widely in their meaning and stylistically neutral union. but. For example: The bottom of the tower was a stone, and the top of the wooden ... (Chekhov); He is long for forty, and her thirty ... (Chekhov).
Soyuz sameassociated with its origin with an amplifier particle same, preserves its excretory-enhancement value; The origin of this union causes his position; It is not worth between predicative parts, but after the first word of the second part, highlighting it. Such proposals are called comparable-excretory. For example: Comrades related to it disliked, soldiers same Loved truly(Kurpros); From our battery salty will go on the barge, we same with a crash part(Chekhov).
Offers S. interpreting relationships According to semantics (i.e., according to the nature of the relations between the parts of the SSP), they are based on the contradictions of the events referred to in predicative parts, and are divided into four groups.
1) counter-restrictive Offers (Unions however, but yes)In which the phenomenon of the second part limits the possibility of implementation, the effectiveness or completeness of the manifestation of the phenomenon called in the first part. This is the most clearly grammatical meaning traced in structures with forms of subjunctive or "invalid" (with a particle it was) inclinations, with auxiliary verbs want, desireand under.: Perhaps I. would eat a little snow but on Sukharevka snow was dirty(V. Cavery). It he began to pour her tea but She stopped(V. Kaverin). In other cases, restrictive attitudes are issued by lexical means: Good flower, yes Shipok.
These SSP are close to semantics offers with a connecting and restrictive value where the word onlyperforms the function of the Union: Good flower, only the sharp ships.
Unions and then not that comply with the meaning of the words otherwise, otherwise;offers with them are usually used in colloquial speech: 1) You, quiet, come, come, And that mama will be scorn again(Acr.).2) Truth say not that you will get.
2) In counter-grade SSP Constive value complicated by seigning (such a SSP can be replaced by a complex proposal, in the subordinate part of which there are unions Although, despite the fact that ): [I had my own room in my house] but [I lived in the yard in the hibarke](A.P. Chekhov ). – (Although I had my own room in my house), [I lived in the yard in Hibarke] . Note words are possible yet, nevertheless, despite this, meanwhile, with everythingand etc.: Pthaha talked to you nonsense, but anyway He is good man (N. Ostrovsky) .
3) B. propolistic-paying SSP (Unions but, but yes) Events are given an estimate: in one part positive, in the other - negative: Rust in gun arsenals, but Current sparkle(K. Simonov). Caiver is a solid high headdress of some military units.
4) B. promptivatives SSP The second part complements the first. As in the connecting and distribution proposals, the word-specizer is observed in the second part. this is: I turned back to him, but this is, it seems that strengthened his suspicion(V. Cavery).
Complex sentences - These are sentences consisting of several simple.
The main means of communication of simple proposals in complex are intonation, alliances (writing and subordinates) and allied words (relative pronouns and primegable).
Depending on the means of communication, complex offers are divided into allied and nessuzny. Union proposals are divided into complexed and complexed.
Complexed Offers (SSP) are complex proposals in which simple proposals are associated with each other intonation and writing unions.
Types of complex proposals for the nature of the Union and the meaning
| Type of SP. | Unions | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| 1. connecting unions (Connecting relationships). | AND; Yes (in meaning and); no no; Yes, and; also; also; not only but. |
Opened the door, and the air from the yard rolled into the kitchen (POUST). |
| 2. Certain offers S. interconnected unions (Compact relationship). | BUT; but; Yes (in meaning but); but (in meaning but); but; but; And that; not that; and not that; Same particle (in the meaning of the Union but); particle only (in the meaning of the Union but). |
Ivan Petrovich gone, and I stayed (Leskov). |
| 3. Certain offers S. separate alliances (dividing relationship). | Or; or; not that ..., not that; then ..., then; Either ..., either. |
Either fish eat either stranded (proverb). |
Note!
1) Writing alliances can associate not only parts of a complex proposal, but also homogeneous members. Their distinction is especially important for the alignment of punctuation marks. Therefore, when parsing, be sure to highlight the grammatical foundations to determine the type of sentence (simple with homogeneous members or a complex offer).
Wed: From the smoke hole, a man and a lot of large sturgeon walked (Sands) - a simple sentence with homogeneous faithful; Money ladies on the road and the helicopter can cause (Sands) - a complex proposal.
2) Writing unions usually occupy a place at the beginning of the second part (the second simple sentence).
In some way Danube serves as a border, but he serves and dear People to each other (Sands).
The exclusion is the unions, too, also, union particles, only. They necessarily occupy or can take a seat in the middle of the second part (the second simple sentence).
My sister and I cried, mother also cried (Aksakov); Comrades treated him disliked, the soldiers loved truly (Kuprin).
Therefore, when parsing, such complex offers are often confused with non-union complex suggestions.
3) Double Union is not only ..., but also expresses gradation relations and in school textbooks are attributed to the connecting unions. Very often, when analyzing, only his second part is taken into account ( but also) And mistakenly refer to the oppositional unions. In order not to make a mistake, try replacing this double union union and.
Wed: Language should be not only clear or simple, but also language must be good (L. Tolstoy). - Language must be understandable or common, and language must be good.
4) By meaning, complex offers are very diverse. Quite often they are close in value to complex proposals.
Wed: You will leave - and it will become dark (Shefner). - If you leave, it will become dark; I did not eat anything, but I did not feel hunger (Tenryakov). - Although I did not eat anything, I did not feel hunger.
However, when parsing is not taken into account, this is not the specific value, and the value due to the type of writing union (connecting, interpreting, separation).
Notes. In some textbooks and manuals, complex suggestions include complex suggestions with explanatory unions. that is, namely, eg: The Board authorized him to speed up the work, that is, in other words, he emphasized himself to this (Kurpros); Bird flights produced as an adaptive instinctive act, namely: it gives birds ability to avoid Unfavorable conditions for winter (Sands). Other researchers relate them to complex proposals or allocate in an independent type of complex proposals. Part of the proposals with particles only, refer to non-union proposals.
Every day school program Gradually leaves our mind and many simple things can mislead. Rules of the Russian language cause such difficulties most often. And even such a thing, as a complex proposal, may have an adult man in a dead end. This article will help to explore or update information on this topic in your head.
In contact with
Complex offer
A complex proposal (SSP) - this in which parts are connected writing connectionswhich is expressed by writing alliances. In this case, all elements are equal and independent.
Division by the meaning of the unions of a complex sentence
- Connectors: And, yes (\u003d and: bread yes salt), and, and, and .. and .., not only .. but, like .. so;
- Dividing: or, or .. and, or, then ..to, or if if, not that .. and then;
- Proputative: a, but, yes (\u003d but: beautiful, yes stupid), but, however.
When children in school are just familiar with the types of proposals, only three groups of writing unions described above are allocated. However, in high school Pupils allocate three more groups:
- Graduation: not only, not so much .. how much is not that ... and not that .. but;
- Explanatory: namely, that is;
- Attachments: moreover, and, and, too, also.
Thus, a complex proposal is distinguished with connecting unions, separation and interpreted, as well as additionally with gradual alliances, explanatory and connecting.
Complex proposals: examples and schemes
After the weekend it became better, and he recovered completely.
Scheme: (), and (). Complex offer with the union and Shows the sequence of actions.
Every day he had to do lessons or help her mother on the house.
Scheme: () or (). Dividing andliemutually exclusive events.
You are now shooting something, and I reconcile a fire.
Scheme: (), a (). Soyuz but - Constive, and therefore, in the sentence there is opposition.
Not only the relatives admired her mind, but also completely strangers.
Scheme: not only (), but also (). This structure of a complex sentence Shares the events of importance and importance.
The leg was broken, that is, he could not continue to continue the path independently.
Scheme: (), that is (). There is an explanatory Soyuz i.e.
We must do this, moreover, we have very little time.
Scheme: (), moreover (). Soyuz traitgives additional facts and information.
Punctuation in complex suggestions
In SSP, elements are separated by commas, point with a comma or with a dash.
The most common punctuation sign - comma. It is placed both in front of solitary and repetitive writing unions:
Let it be anyhow to God, and the law should be executed.
Scheme: (), a ().
Or I will come tomorrow, or you come.
Scheme: or (), or ().
Semicolon Used in the case when the elements of the SSP are strongly distributed, and the commas are already used:
The boy rejoiced a new snake, ran after him and was the most happy man; And the elements have already prepared to shed rain, overclock the wind and break the branches of trees.
Scheme: (); but ().
The point with a comma may also be put when the sentence has several parts:
I have such an opinion, and you have – Other; And each of us is right in your own way.
Scheme: (), a (); and ().
Dash It is raised if parts of the complex proposal have a sharp oppression or sharp change of events:
Hall for a second meal – And immediately there were wild ovations.
Scheme: () - and ().
When punctuation marks are not put
Parts of the SSP are:
- Questionnaire: When will you still be in the city and dare if I ask for a meeting?
- Indisputable: Do it all well and let you handle everything.
- Exclamation: You are so well done and I like everything so much!
- We call: Cold and wind. Duchot and heat.
- Impersonal suggestions: Cold and windy. Stuffy and sump.
Kyzylorda region Slail district
communal state Institution "Kazakh high school №152 "
in grade 9.
Theme lesson:
2015-2016 academic year
"I approve" ___________
Item Russian speech
Class 9
date 22.10 .2015
Subject
Complexed suggestions with separation unions
Objectives of training
to learn to recognize the SSP with dividing unions or, or, then, not among other SSPs; develop the skills of self-study of the material; continue the development of speech, thinking, memory, creative abilities students; educate hard work, the ability to work in the team, goodwill, cooperation, mutual assistance,
interest in the subject.
Expected results
Pupils will learn how to use SSP in oral and written speechCan work individually, in the group, will learn to analyze, express their opinions, evaluate yourself and others.
For e.we and methods
Strategy of critical thinking "», cluster.
Group, individual, Group Work.
Resources, equipment
Tutorial, Chalk, Board, Interactive Board, Slides, Clusters, Stickers, Envelope, Evaluation Sheet
Stage
Time
Teacher's activities
Activities of students
Evaluation
Org. moment
3 min
1. Creating an emotional attitude to a lesson.
The teacher welcomes students, wishes good luck. Reception "Compliments".
2. division into groups. The teacher invites students to share for 3 groups.
Pteachers are rivorysmile, talk to each other compliments.
They are divided into 3 groups, according to records on the "Connecting" stickers, "Proportional", "dividing".
Smile to each other, joy from communication
Call
min.
Staging a learning task.
Repetition of the material passed by reception« Faithful and wrong statements»
1. A complex offer consistsof the two and several simple sentences.
2. Parts of the SP.not equal in meaning and connected subordinate unions.
3. Connecting unions area, but, however, but.
4 . In sspbefore the opponent unions, a comma is always put.
5. SSP with connecting unions denote phenomenawhich occur simultaneously or follow one after another.
6. In complex suggestions with dividing unionsone phenomenon is opposed to another.
Pupils respond to questions, change notebooks, check each other on the answer key (answer key on the slide).
No error - 3 points
1 Error - 2 points
2 and more - 1 point
The leader of the group exposes estimates in the estimated sheet.
Key:
1 Yes, 2 No, 3 No, 4 Yes, 5 Yes, 6 No
Relationship
(estimation sheet)
2. Remove
12 min
Transition to new topic. The teacher uses a research conversation with students and brings to the next topic, then writes the number and theme of the lesson.
The subject of the lesson: "Difficult offers with dividing unions".
Gives a task to groups: make a cluster "writing unions". Reception "Carousel".
Students record the number and theme of the lesson, then get acquainted with theoretical material.
The cluster is completed, the clusters of another group complement the clusters.
Formative estimation "Two stars and one wish"
17 min
Strategy "Who is the first will be?".
The teacher gives tasks to groups.
1st group. UPR.52, p. 39. Rewrite the proposals, inserting the union items instead of points; Determine in which suggestions the alternation of the phenomenon in which mutual exclusion.
2nd group. UPR. 54, p.40. Rewrite the text by sticking the desired letters and setting the punctuation marks.
3rd group. 61, p. 43. Rewrite, exposing the punctuation marks.
Individual task "Check yourself!"
Argument punctuation signs
Then the sun shoved, it was raining. (1 point)
On the grief, the forest of the malachite shade was spread, then herbal glades were glittered in the sun. (2 points)
The conversation then cleaned that resumed with a new force and as if listening to the news The river wave lazily moved the coastal pebbles. (3 points).
Pupils perform their group exercises, together, together, helping each other. Speakers groups clarify the material to all students.
Apply the evaluation criteria
The correctness of the response students check the slide.
Relationship by criteria
transfer notebooks in a circle, check each other
Self-test
self-standard
Reflection
min.
The teacher receives feedback. Strategy "Envelope Question".
On this topic, each group gives one question, but each student gives his answer, writes on the sticker and puts into an envelope.
The teacher praises students for work and proposes to raise one of three colors, according to his perception of the lesson.
Pupils think and answer the question, write on the sticker, put into the envelope. The teacher collects envelopes, takes out any sticker from there, reads the answer. Pupils give their consent and assessment for the correctness of each other's response.
Pupils raise one of the three colors on the reception "traffic light."
Relationship
min.
Now let's see the estimation sheet and see who received what an assessment.
All agree?
Take a home task, write to the diary.
The leader of the group announces and summarizes the estimates.
Record task: Find examples with dividing unions from artistic works, learn the rule.
Advancemental estimation
- Earth's atmosphere and physical air properties
- The land passes through the meteor flow of Perside - the sky decorated the real star rain
- Constellation Swan - Heavenly Bird
- Nebula in Persea Constellation
- Home Astronomy: How to look at the sky to make a scientific discovery where to start learning astronomy yourself
- Andromeda when it is better to observe
- Astronomical events October.