10 complex suggestions with different types of apparent. NGN with several additives: Examples. Comma and dash in a complex sentence
Live Journal
Facebook.
Twitter.Considers the structure of phrases and suggestions. At the same time, special difficulty usually causes design and punctuation registration of various types of complex proposals, especially with three and more predicative parts. Consider on specific examples, the types of NGN with several apparent, ways to communicate in them by the main and pressing parts, the rules for the formulation of punctuation marks.
Complexed offer: definition
To clearly express the thought, we use different proposals is characterized by the fact that it highlights two or more predicative parts. They can be equivalent to each other or to enter into relationships. NGN is such a proposal in which the pressing part obeys the main and joins it with the help of subordinate unions and / or for example, " [Stepka is very tired by the evening], (why?) (Since he passed no less than ten kilometers per day)" Hereinafter refers to the main part, round - dependent. Accordingly, in NGN with several apparers, no less than three predicative parts are isolated, two of which will be dependent: " [Locality, (what?) (Which was now passing), was well familiar with Andrei Petrovich], (why?) (Since good half of his childhood has passed here)" It is important to correctly determine the proposals where they need to put commas.
NGN with multiple apparent
A table with examples will help determine which types of complex proposals with three and more predicative parts are divided.
View of the subordinate part of the main | Example |
Consistent | The guys rushed to the river with a scatter, the water in which was already warmed enough, because the last days were incredibly hot. |
Parallel (inhomogeneous) | When the speaker finished talking, silence reigned in the hall, since the audience was shocked heard. |
Homogeneous | Anton Pavlovich said that reinforcement would arrive and what only you need to suffer. |
FROM different species Submission | Nastya re read a letter for the second time, which trembled in her hands, and thought that she would now have to take off her studies that her hopes were not justified for new life. |
We will understand how to properly determine the type of submission in the NGN with several apparent. Assist in this above examples.
Consistent submission
In a sentence " [Guys, we rushed into the river] 1, (water in which is already warmed enough) 2, (because the last days were incredibly hot) 3"First, we highlight three parts. Then, with the help of questions, we establish the semantic relationships: [... x], (in which ... x), (because ...). We see that the second part has become main for the third.
We give another example. " [The table was a vase with wildflowers], (who were gathered by the guys), (when they went to the forest on the excursion)" The scheme of this NGN is similar to the first: [... x], (which ... x), (when ...).
With homogeneous submission, each subsequent part depends on the previous one. Such NGNs with several additives are examples of this confirm - resemble a chain, where each subsequent link joins the located in front.
Parallel (inhomogeneous) submission
In this case, all the apparent refer to the main (to the whole part or the word in it), but respond to different questions and differ in value. " (When the speaker finished talking) 1, [the silence was reigned] 2 in the hall, (since the public was shocked heard) 3 " Let's analyze this NGN with several apparent. The scheme will look like this: (when ...), [... x], (as ...). We see that the first pressing part (it is before the main thing) means time, and the second reason. Consequently, they will answer different questions. The second example: " [Vladimir today certainly had to learn] 1, (in which hours the train arrives from Tyumen) 2, (in order to have a comrade) 3" The first pressing part is an exemplary, the second is the goals.
Uniform submission
This is the case when it is appropriate to carry out an analogy with another known syntactic design. For registration of PP with homogeneous members and such a NGN with several additive rules are the same. Indeed, in the sentence " [Anton Pavlovich spoke about] 1, (that reinforcement will arrive) 2 and (that you just need to suffer a little) 3»Pressure parts - the 2nd and 3rd - belong to one word, answer the question" What? " Both are extremely empty. In addition, they are interconnected using the Union and, in front of which the comma does not put. Imagine this in the scheme: [... x], (that ...) and (that ...).
In a NGN with several apparent subordinate to uniform subordination between the pressing parts, any writing unions are sometimes used - punctuation rules will be the same as when designing homogeneous members - and the subordinate union in the second part may be completely absent. For example, " [He was standing for a long time at the window and watched] 1, (how to house the car) 2 and (workers unloaded building materials) 3».
NGN with multiple subordination with different types of subordination
Very often, four or more parts are highlighted in a complex proposal. In this case, they can contact each other in different ways. Let us turn to the example given in the table: " [Nastya re-read the letter for the second time, (which trembled in her hands) 2, and thought] 1, (that now they will have to throw studies) 3, (that its hopes for new life were not justified) 4" This is a proposal with parallel (inhomogeneous) (P 1,2,3-4) and homogeneous (p 2,3,4) subordination: [... x, (which ...), ... x], (that ...), (that ... ). Or another option: " [All the way Tatiana was silent and just looked out the window] 1, (followed by small, closely located to each other villages) 2, (where people fussed) 3 and (boil the work) 4) ". This is a complex proposal with sequential (P 1,2,3 and P 1,2,4) and a homogeneous (n 2,3,4) subordination: [... x], (beyond which ...), (where ...) and (... ).
Punctuation signs at the junction of unions
To arrange in a complex sentence, it usually happens to correctly determine the boundaries of predicative parts. Complexity, as a rule, represents the punctuation of the NGN with several additives - examples of schemes: [... x], (when, (which is ...), ...) or [... x], [... x], (like (with whom ...), then ...) - When two subordination union (allied words) are nearby. This is characteristic of consistent submission. In this case, you need to pay attention to the presence of the second part of the double union in the proposal. For example, " [The disclosed book remained on the sofa] 1, (which, (if time left) 3, Konstantin would certainly read to the end) 2. "Second option: " [I swear] 1, (that (when I return from the trip home) 3, then I will definitely visit you and tell you about everything in detail) 2 ". When working with such a NGN with several appropriate rules, the following. If the second apprehensible can be excluded from the proposal without prejudice for the meaning, commaed between unions (and / or allied words) is set, if not - is missing. Let us return to the first example:" [The sofa lay a book] 1, (which was necessary to have time to finish) 2 ". In the second case, with the exclusion of the second suppression part, the grammatical system of supply will be disturbed by the word "TO".
To remember
A good assistant in the development of NGN with several apparers - exercises, the execution of which will help consolidate the knowledge gained. At the same time, it is better to act according to the algorithm.
- Carefully read the offer, designate in it the grammatical foundations and indicate the boundaries of predicative parts (simple proposals).
- Allocate all means of communication, not forgetting about composite or used near alliances.
- Install the semantic links between parts: To do this, first find the main one, then ask it the question (s) to the apparent (s).
- Build a scheme showing on it the addiction of parts from each other, put the punctuation marks in it. Transfer commas in the recorded offer.
Thus, attentiveness in constructing and analyzing (including punctuation) complex proposal - SPP with several additives specifically - and the support on the features listed above syntactic design Provide the correct implementation of the proposed tasks.
Complexed proposals may not have one, but several prescripts.
Completed proposals with two or more additives are two main species:
1) all apparent joins directly to the main sentence;
2) The first appreciation joins the main proposal, the second - to the first pressing and so on.
I. Podep, which are joined directly to the main sentence may be homogeneous and inhomogeneous.
1. Completed proposals with homogeneous coented apparent.
With this submission, all apparent applies to one word in the main sentence or to the entire main proposal, respond to the same question and belong to the same type of departing proposals. Between themselves, homogeneous appendages can be associated with writing alliances or non-union (only with the help of intonation). Communication of homogeneous attachments with the main proposal and among themselves remind the relationship of homogeneous members of the sentence.
For example:
[I came to you with greetings, tell], (that the sun rose), (that it is hot light on sheets fluttered). (A. Fet.)
[TOT, (who lives a real life), (who is used to poetry from childhood), eternally believes in the life-giving, full of mind Russian]. (N. Zabolotsky.)
[At the end of May, the young marsh pulled into native places], (where she was born) and ( where many months of childhood were so memorable).
In a complex proposal with homogeneous submission in the second subordinate may be absent subordaneous union.
For example: ( If there is water) and ( there will be no fish), [i will not believe the water ]. (M. Svtain.) [ Wheel], (if a bird suddenly shoots) or ( elk protrudes away). (Y. Drunina.)
2. Complexed proposals with inhomogeneous subordination of the apparent (or with parallel subordination). With this submission, the apparent belongs:
a) to different words of the main offer or one part to the whole main, and the other to one of his words;
b) to one word or to the whole main sentence, but respond to different questions and are different types of departing offers.
For example: ( When I have in my hands a new book ), [i feel], (that there is something living in my life, saying wonderful). (M. Gorky.)
(If we turn to the best samples of prose), [that is convinced], (that they are full of genuine poetry). (K. Powesty.)
[From the world (which is called childhood), the door leads to space], (where they dine and drink tea) (Chekhov).
II. Completed proposals with consistent subordination of the apparent.
To this type of complex proposals with two or more apparent applications include such that the apparent proposals form a chain: the first appropriate refers to the main proposal (the apparent 1-th degree), the second subordinate refers to the apparent 1st degree (the apparent 2nd degree) etc.
For example: [ Young Cossacks went vaguely and held tears], (since they were afraid of the father), (which was also somewhat confused), (although I tried not to show it). (N. Gogol)
The specificity of the pressing parts at the same time is that each of them is apparent to the previous and most important to the subsequent.
For example: Often, I closely followed the fallen leaves to catch the wrong share of a second when the sheet is separated from the branch and begins to fall on the ground (POUST).
With a consistent submission, one appropriate can be inside the other; In this case, there may be two subordination unions: what and if, that and when, and since, etc.
For example: [ Water fell so scary], (what, (when soldiers fled down), they were already flying raging streams) (M. Bulgakov).
There are also complex proposals with combined type subordination of pressing proposals.
For example: ( When a bunch left from the yard), [he (Chichikov) looked back and saw], (that the companion still standing on the porch and, as it seemed, looked like, wanting to learn), (where the guest will go). (Gogol)
This is a complex proposal with parallel and consistent submission of the apparent proposals.
Punctuation marks in a complex sentence with several apparent
The comma is put between homogeneous petition offers, not connected by writing alliances.
For example: I understood that I was lying in bed , that I am sick , What I only got. (KUPER.)
I envy someone who lived in battle , Who defended the Great Idea.(EU.)
We remember the hour is the great one when the guns were silent , When I met the victory all the people and in the cities, and in every village. (Isak.)
Comma not putbetween homogeneous subordinate suggestions connected by single connecting Union (regardless of whether there is a subordinate union or an allied word at both pressing parts or only at first).
For example: I believe that nothing passes without a trace and that every slightest step is doing importance for a real and future life. (C.)
The militia brought Prince Andrei to the forest, where they stood the truck and where there was a dressing point. (L. T.)
When the rain went and cracked everything around, we were traverse ... left the forest. (M. P.).
Upon repetition of writing unions, the commament between the coinled departies is placed.
For example: Everyone learned that the lady came, and that Kapitonch was let her , And that she is now in the children's ... (L. T.).
Unions lee ... or When connecting the predicative parts of a complex proposal, it is considered repeated, and homogeneous petitions are divided into a comma, which is placed before or.
For example: Whether in the city of the wedding, or who had fun celebrated the name day, Peter Mikhailovich was always happy to tell about it. (PR.)
With inhomogeneous coented, pressing proposals are separated or allocated by commas.
For example: As soon as the heat dumped, it became so quickly cold and darken in the forest, which I didn't want to stay in it. (T.)
Who did not experience the excitement from the barely audible breath of the sleeping young woman, he will not understand what tenderness is. (Paust.).
With sequential and mixed submission, the comma is placed between the pressing parts according to the same rules as between the main and pressing part.
For example: Would be our wanderers to the native roof , if you could know , What happened to grisha.(Necr.)
Helen smiled with such a kind , who spoke , that she did not allow , To anyone could see it and not be admired. (L. T.)
Any , Who in life fought for happiness to be ourselves , knows , that the power and success of this struggle depends on confidence , which is a seeker (M. P.)
The comma is put Between the two nearby subordinate unions or between the Union Word and the Supervisory Union, as well as at a meeting of writing and verifying unions, if the inner subordinate part does not follow the second part of the double union or so.
For example: The bear so loved Nikita that , whenhe left somewhere, the beast anxiously sniffed the air. (M. G.)
We were warned that , if a There will be bad weather, the excursion will not take place.
Night ended and , when Sun asked, all nature came to life.
The seizure of the second (internal) part here does not require the restructuring of the first apparent part.
If the second part of the complex union should be followed by the appointment tOT, the comma between the previous two unions is not put.
For example: Blind knew that the sun was looking at the room and that if he had hand in the window, the dew sprinkled from the bushes. (Cor.)
I thought that if in a decisive minute I would not repture the old man, then it is later difficult for me to free yourself from his guardianship. (P.).
The withdrawal or permutation of the apparent part (if it exits the hand in the window and if in a decisive moment I will not repture the old man) is impossible, since the part of the double union is there.
Dash in a complex sentence
Between the pressing part (group of Podep) and the subsequent main part of the sentence can put a tire If the appropriate part or a group of the appropriate parts preceding the main proposal is pronounced with the logical allocation of an informatively important word and with a deep pause before the main part (usually the applied emotional parts are distinguished, less often conditional, gradual, etc.).
For example: Where Nelidov left - Natasha did not know (Paust.); And if you look at them for a long time - Rocks began to move, crumble (AST.); Whether he called them, whether they came to themselves - Nevakov never found out ...(T.).
The dash is set Also between the pressing and main parts in the same type of constructed parallel complex proposals.
For example: Whoever has fun - he laughs who wants - he will achieve who is looking for - he will always find! (L.-K.).
The dash is set After the pressing part, before the main thing, if there are words in it, this is, and also if the apparent part is an incomplete offer.
For example: That she is honest - it's clear to me. (T.)
What he found in her is his business.
Where he is now what does - this is the questions that I could not answer.
I answered something that - I myself do not know (Compare complete - what I answered).
The dash is set Between the coented pressing parts in the absence of a conventional union or the second part of the comparative union.
For example: Artistic is so that every word was not only at the place - so that it is necessary, inevitably And so that you could less words (Chern.).
The dash is set with a clarifying character of the apparent part.
For example: Only once she revived - When Mick told herThat in yesterday's wedding sang a chastushki.(R. Zerinov)
The dash is set To strengthen the questionality of the proposal, when emphasizing the unusual of the arrangement of the pressing part before the main or intonational separation of the main part of the subsequent pressing.
For example: What is the effect - you know?; Are you sure - is it necessary?
The dash is also placed on the abundance of commas, against whom a dash is acting as a more expressive sign.
For example: But we have gained experience , And for experience , as they say , How much will pay - do not overpaid.
Comma and dash in a complex sentence
Comma and dash as a single punctuation sign is put in a complex proposal before the main part, which is preceded by a number of homogeneous petitioners, if the disintegration of a complex supply for two parts is underlined with a long pause before the main part.
For example: Wherever I am, whatever I tried to have fun , "All my thoughts were busy with Olesy." (KUPER.)
Who is to blame from them who is right , - Not to judge us.(Cr.)
The same sign is also placed before the word repeated in the same part of the proposal in order to associate a new offer with him or the next part of the same offer.
For example: I knew very well that it was my husband, not any new, unknown to me a man, but a good man , - My husband, whom I knew how my own. (L. T.)
And the idea that he can be guided by this interest that he will be looking for reconciliation with his wife for the sale of this forest , - This thought insulted him. (L. T.)
The dash is set After the comma closing the pressing part, including before the word it is.
For example: The best thing he could do , - in time to leave; The only thing I like here , - This is an old shady park.
Syntactic analysis of a complex proposal with several apparent
Collection scheme for a complex sentence with several apparent
1. Consider the type of sentence on the purpose of the statement (narrative, questional, prompting).
2. Specify the type of offer on emotional color (exclamation or non-visible).
3. Determine the main and pressing proposals, find their borders.
4. Create a proposal scheme: Set (if possible) issues from the main thing to the apparent, indicate in the main word, on which the apparent (if it is sent), to characterize the means of communication (alliances or allied words), to determine the types of apparent (definitive, spectative and etc.).
5. Conduct the type of subordination of the apparent (homogeneous, parallery, consistent).
Sample parsing complex proposal with several apparent
1) [You will look at the pale green, covered with stars sky,(on which there is no cloud, nor spots), And understand], (why Summer Warm Air Real), (why natureoutside) (A. Chekhov).
[... SUB., ( on which…), and verb.], ( why…), (why…).
(Narrative, unkonsectant, complex, complex with three apparent, with parallel and homogeneous submission: the 1st apparent - the apparent determination (the apparent depends on the noun sky, answers the question what on which); 2nd and 3rd apparent - the apparent extaste (depend on the verb catchanswer the question what? Join the Union Word Why)).
2) [Any humanknows], (what he needs to do wrong, (what disconnects it with people), and that), (what connects it to them) (L. Tolstoy).
[... verb.], ( what…., (what…), and that), (what…).
(Narrative, non-surcharge, complex, complex with three apparent, with consistent and parallel submission: 1st Podep - Pressible Issuctive (depends on the verb knows, answers the question what? joined the union what), 2nd and 3rd apparent - apparent locomotive-identifications (each of them depends on pronoun that, answers the question what (that)? joined the union word what).
Task B6. Checks your ability to analyze and disassemble a complex offer. Depending on the option, you will need to find:
1) a complex proposal;
2) a complex proposal;
3) a complex proposal with a certain type of apparent;
4) a complex proposal with several apparent indicating the type of addition of the appling to the main one;
5) a complex non-union proposal;
6) Complex offer with different types of communication.
Tip from the site.
To remember different types of communication, re-read the A9 task.
The following scheme will also help you:
Complex sentence.
Complex sentence - This proposal, which includes two and more bases, where one basis is subject to another.
Since the proposal structure, the question from the main basis for dependent (apparent) can be different, then the types of complex several:
| Type of apparent | Features of the apparent | What question answers | Means of communication | |
| unions | union words | |||
| definition | contains the characteristic of the subject, reveals its sign (refers to the noun in the main part) | what? which one? |
to, as if, as if | which, what, what, whose, when, where, where, etc. |
| promotional-determined | refers to pronoun in the main part of the NGN ( then, that, those, everyone, any, any, all, all, all) and specifies the pronoun value | who exactly? what exactly? |
how, as if, as if that, to | who, what, what, what, whose, which, etc. |
| issuctive | pressure part requires words with the meaning of thought, feelings, speech (verb, adjective, noun) | questions of indirect cases (what? about what? What?) |
what, as if, as if, as if, as if, so far | who, what, which, what, whose, where, where, from where, how much, how much, why |
| image image and degree | 1) discloses a method or quality of the action, as well as a measure or degree of manifestation of a trait in the main part of the sentence; 2) have in the main part of the words ( so, so much thus, before, so much to that degree ...). |
as? how? to what extent or degree? |
that, as if, exactly | |
| places | 1) contains an indication in the place or space where what is being made, as stated in the main part; 2) can distribute the main part or disclose the content of the shortcoming there, there, from there, everywhere, everywhere and etc. |
where? | where, where, from where | |
| of time | 1) indicates the time of the action or manifestation of a trait referred to in the main part; 2) can distribute the main part or clarify the circumstance of the time in the main part |
when? how long? since when? how long? |
when, while, as, while, after, since, barely, only | |
| conditions | 1) contains an indication on the condition on which the implementation of what is said in the main part is indicated; 2) the condition can be undertaken in the main part of the combination in that case |
with what condition? | if, how, how soon, time, if ... Lee | |
| the reasons | contains an indication of the cause or justification of what is said in the main part | why? for what reason? |
because, because, because, due to the fact that, due to the fact that, due to the fact that, due to the fact that, because etc. | |
| goal | contains an indication of a module or assignment of what is said in the main part of the sentence | what for? for what purpose? for what? |
to, in order to, so that, so that, if only, if only | |
| concessions | contains an indication on the condition, contrary to which is committed what is said in the main part | despite what? contrary to what? |
although, despite the fact that, despite the fact that, let, let, in order that | |
| comparative | compares objects or phenomena in the main part and the apparent | as? (What does it seem what?) |
as, just like, as if, as if, exactly, as if | |
| corollary | indicates a consequence arising from the main part of the sentence | what follows from this? what was the consequence? |
so that | |
Complete proposal with several apparent
Sophisticated offer with different types of communication (examples)
(1) Morning magnificent: cool in the air; The sun is not high yet.
(2) And the steering wheel is, and the skin creaks, and are taken into the reefs of the canvas.
(3) I want to hear you, how to whine my voice is alive.
(4) There are glory for everyone, work - and she is yours.
(5) The grief will come true, the miracle is accomplished, it will come true that as long as he only dreams.
(6) I looked at the hut, and my heart sank - it always happens when you see what many years thought about.
(7) And yet he was sad, and he somehow was particularly dryed by the head of the headquarters that he was killed by an adjutant and need to find a new one.
Algorithm actions.
1. Select the foundations.
2. Exclude all simple suggestions.
3. See what the foundations are related: the union, the union word, intonation.
4. Determine the boundaries of the foundations.
5. Determine the type of communication.
Help the task.
Among the proposals 1-5, find a complex proposal with the apparent exemption. Write its number.
(1) In childhood, I hated the matinee, because a father came to our garden. (2) He sat on the chair near the tree, a long pilical on his accordion, trying to choose the right melody, and our teacher said strictly to him: "Valery Petrovich, higher!" (H) All the guys looked at my father and gathered from laughter. (4) He was small, plumpy, early began to lie, and, although he never drank, for some reason he always had a beet-red color, like a clown. (5) Children, when they wanted to say about someone that he was funny and ugly, they spoke like this: "He looks like a Ksyushkin dad!"
We highlight the foundations:
(1) In childhood, I hated the matinee, because a father came to our garden. (2) He sat on the chair near the tree, a long pilot on his accordion, trying to choose the desired melody, and our educator Strictly told him: "Valery Petrovich, higher!" (H) All the guys looked at my father and gathered from laughter. (4) He was a little, plump, early began to lie, and, although he never drank, he had a pending sofa-color, like a clown. (5) Children, when they wanted to say about someone that he was funny and ugly, they spoke like this: "He looks like a Ksyushkin dad!"
Simple is the proposal number 3. I exclude it.
We define the boundaries of proposals and see what the foundations are related:
(1) [in childhood I hated the matinee], ( because what Father came to the garden). (2) [He sat on the chair near the tree, a long pilot on his accordion, trying to choose the desired melody], but[our educator Strictly told him]: "Valery Petrovich, higher!" (4) [He was small, plump, early began to lie], and, (although He never drank), [his nose for some reason he always had a beet red color, like a clown]. (5) [Children, ( when Want to say about someone), ( what He is funny and ugly), said so]: "He looks like a Ksyushkin dad!"
The first sentence is complex with the apparent reason (I hated the matinee why? Because the father came).
The second offer is a complex with a direct speech.
The fourth sentence is complex with writing (union and) and a subordination link (presidency although ...).
The fifth offer is complex with two apparent and direct speech. First Podep - Time (the children said when? When they wanted to say about someone); The second attachment is an exemplary (wanted to say about someone what? that he is funny and ugly).
Thus wayThe correct answer is to offer No. 5.
Practice.
1. Among the proposals 1 - 9, find a complex offer in which there is an apparent condition. Write the number of this offer.
(1) It is not difficult to imagine what was happening at this moment in the soul of the commander: His who had an unbearable burden of shameful retreat, deprived the glory of the victorious battle. (2) ... Barclay's road carriage stopped at one of the postal stations near Vladimir. (3) He went to the house stationeryBut the path was blocked by a huge crowd. (4) The offensive cries, threats heard. (5) ADUTUNATU Barclaya to nominate a saber to pave the road to the carriage. (6) What did the old soldier comforted, on whom the unfair wrath of the crowd fell? (7) Perhaps faith in the right point of their decision: it is this faith that gives a person to go to the end, even if you are alone. (8) And maybe, maybe Barclay comforted hope. (9) Nadezhda for the fact that someday impassable time to make everyone with merits and a fair trial of history will necessarily justify the old warrior, who is sullenly going into a carriage by a roaring crowd and swallows bitter tears.
2. Among the proposals 1 - 10, find a complex proposal, which includes (in) the apparent comparison. Write the number (s) of this offer.
(1) I, no matter how rushing, could not imagine that there were once there at home, the noisy children were running, the apple trees were growing, women dried underwear ... (2) No sign of the past life! (3) Nothing! (4) Only sad knobs mournfully swinging stems and the dying river barely moved among the reasons ... (5) I suddenly became scary, as if the earth was exposed under me and I was on the edge of the bottomless abyss. (6) Can't be! (7) Is there really nothing to oppose this deaf, indifferent eternity? (8) In the evening I cooked my ear. (9) Mishka threw firewood into the fire and climbing with its cyclopic spoon in the pot - to remove the sample. (10) Shadows moved next to us, the shadows moved, and it seemed to me that there were no time people who lived here from the past to warm up from the fire and tell about their lives.
3. Among the proposals 1 - 11, find a complex offer with homogeneous apparent. Write the number of this offer.
(1) On the banks of the river sat the old man in the nautical uniform. (2) The last caution of dragonflies trembled over it, some sat down on the felling epolutes, faded and jumped when the man occasionally moved. (3) He was stuffy, he relaxed his hand for a long time unbuttoned collar and silence, peered away with a small waves, clapping the river. (4) What did you see him now in this shallow water? (5) What did he think about? (6) Until recently, he still knew that he won great victories, which was able to escape from captivity of old theories and opened new laws of sea fight, which created not one invincible squadron, raised a lot of glorious commanders and crews of warships.
20. Types of apparent values. SPP with different types of communication: Types of submission in simple proposals in NGN with several additive types of departing offers
In order to understand this article, you need to know what complex suggestions are. Read about it here.
In a complex proposal, the main part and the appling part (or pressing parts) are distinguished. The dressing part depends on the main one.
Depending on the value, the apparent offers are divided into several types: issuctive, determinatory,circumstantial, attachments.
Candidate of claims
Putting-free explanatory offers are served to explain the words from the main part and are responsible for cases ( who? what? who? what? who? what? by whom? than? o Com? about what?).
Putting-empty can be attached unions what, to, like, as, like, as if et al. and allied words who, that who, whose, where, where, from where, what, why, why, how much (These are the same words from which questions may begin).
The dog opened the right languid eye and saw it that he was tightly bandaged with his side and belly. (M.A. Bulgakov. "Dog's heart") Put supply offer answers the question "What?": had seen - what? - that he is tightly bandaged across the sides and belly. Here what - This is an union.
I imagine that now will be in the apartment. (M.A. Bulgakov. "Dog's heart") Put supply offer answers the question "What?": imagine - what? - what will happen in the apartment. Here what - This is a union word. It is subject to appropriate sentence. The endurance prize was awarded to those who swam the river last. The apparent offer answers the question "Who?": agriculture - Who? - who swam the river last.
The type of pressing offer should be determined by what question it is responsible, and not by the union or the union word, which it is attached.
I saw a wolf out of the forest. The apparent offer answers the question "What?" (and not "How?"): saw - what? - how did the wolf come out of the forest.
I want you to accomplish bolder and more decisive. The apparent offer answers the question "What?": want - What? - so you act like the bolder and more decisive. This is an impressive applied, and not an appropriate goal (as it would be possible to think by the Union to).
Newton explained why the apples always fall down. The apparent offer answers the question "What?" (not "Why?"): explained - what? - why apples always fall down. This is an appreciable.
I asked my comrade where he was going to leave. The apparent offer answers the question "what?": asked - What? - where is he going to leave. This is an appreciable, rather, and not an apparent place (as it would be possible to think about the union word where to).
Expressive proposals perform the same role as additions (that is, all the appendage proposal is, in fact, one large addition).
Candidate definitions
The definition applied proposal determines some kind of noun or pronoun from the main part and answers questions " what?», « which the?».
Most often, the apparent definition joins with the help of allied words what, which the, whose, what, where, when,from and etc.
I kissed Helen's hand, in which she kept an umbrella. (S. Dovlatov. "Our") Put supply offer answers the question "What?": hand - What? - in which she kept an umbrella.
In those years, he was almost an associate professor of the music school, where he created a pop class on his initiative. (S. Dovlatov. "Our") Put supply offer answers the question "What?" (and not "Where?"): school - What? - where on his initiative created a pop class. This is an apparent definition, and not an apparent place (as it would be possible to think about the Union Word where).
That instant when he pulled the curtains, the sky illuminated a flash of lightning, and Fandorine saw behind the glass, right in front of him, a lonely white face with black lints of the eyes. (B. Akunini. "Azazel") Putin offer answers the question "What?" (and not "when?"): instant - What? - when he pulled out the curtains. This is an appropriate definition, and not a pressure time (as it would be possible to think about the Union Word when).
Puttingular definitions perform the same role that definitions.
| " |
- Wipers and waves, laws and formulas
- How the brain deceives our senses
- Secrets of the reaction of metal sodium with water
- Nominal parts of speech, their general features
- I do not die the soul in the cherished lyre
- During or during the right?
- Franco Agamenone live score, schedule and results - Tennis Agamemenon, King of the leader of Ahetsev in the Trojan War