Essay: description of the painting by Ksenia Uspenskaya-Kologrivova and illustration by O. V. Popovich “They didn’t take me fishing. An essay based on the painting by Popovich “They didn’t take me fishing. A brief description of the painting they didn’t take me fishing.”

O.V. Popovich is a Russian artist who in his work depicts the everyday life of people, their lives, everyday life, situations familiar to everyone.

“We Didn’t Take You Fishing” is a painting depicting a rather ordinary situation. The little boy was very upset because he was not taken fishing with him.

Looking at the picture, we immediately see the main character - this is a boy aged 3-5 years. He is wearing the simplest shirt and pants that are held on by straps. The child is clearly upset and offended. He pouted his lips and looked like he was about to cry.

Looking further at the picture, the boy’s reaction immediately becomes clear. His father and brother go fishing, but they don't take him with them because he is still too small. The kid has a bucket of worms in his hand, which he had dug up in advance, and he got up early. He was probably looking forward to this event, he was preparing, but he was not accepted.

The painting depicts an early morning, the villagers have already woken up and are going to do their homework. It is best to have time to do such work before noon, when the heat will begin, and it will be very hard to work.

Fishing usually takes the whole day. Because of this, the adults did not take the baby. He will quickly get tired, young children still do not have the perseverance that is needed to catch fish. There will be a lot of insects near the pond that can seriously bite the child. Obviously, adults did not take the child out of good intentions, and not because he was guilty of something.

The boy's brother, walking behind his father, turns to look at his younger brother. The artist depicted sympathy on his brother’s face. He probably also remembers his feelings when he himself was not taken fishing, and he cried with resentment and was upset.

Also in the picture we see a girl dressed in a pink dress. She looks out from behind the door and smiles. Of course, it is difficult for her to understand what the boy is experiencing. Most likely, she will simply try to calm the baby down and keep him busy with something so that he quickly forgets his grievances.

The painting “We Didn’t Take You Fishing” is imbued with people’s feelings. There is resentment, bitterness, sympathy and simply curiosity and misunderstanding. Of course, it’s a pity for the boy, because this is how he prepared for fishing. However, soon he will grow up and he will be allowed to go fishing with adults. Therefore, he just has to be patient and just wait.

Option 2

Popovich painted a huge number of different paintings. And one of them is the painting “We Didn’t Take You Fishing.” This depicts exactly the situation that happens to every person. And, probably, every person at any age has encountered it. This depicts a very young child who is very upset and, judging by the title of the picture, what upset him was that his relative did not take him with him, although he promised in advance. The child is only four or five years old. He is wearing an ordinary white house shirt and pants, and since they can fall at any moment, they are secured with straps. The boy's face reveals all the resentment that is inside him, because his desire, which he had long dreamed of, did not come true. And from this insult he is ready to cry.

From all this we can conclude that the father and older brother went fishing and yesterday they promised that they would take him with them too, but today plans suddenly changed and he stayed at home, and they left. In his head he constantly replays everything that happened and does not understand why it happened to him, but he is already a grown boy. Besides this, he did everything to fulfill his desire. He got up before everyone else, dressed himself and went to the garden, where he dug up worms and put them in a jar.

The sun had just begun to rise outside, but had not yet fully risen. But not all the people have gone out into the street yet, but everyone, because many of them are still sleeping. Some adults got up to do their homework and then go to work. And those people who are not in a hurry, but also got up early to do a little digging in the garden, because then the sun will rise and it will be very hard to work, besides, not everyone can stand the heat.

As many already know, they go fishing early in the morning and return late at night. And many people don’t really like this and cause inconvenience. And that's all, because you have to sit in one place or walk around the lake, and it's also impossible to hide from the sun anywhere and it will get you everywhere. In addition, there are a huge number of mosquitoes here, from which it is practically impossible to hide anywhere. And they will constantly sit on your arms and legs and bite, and even if you have nerves of steel, then they won’t be able to withstand it either. But small children may simply not be able to stand it and start crying and fishing will not work.

The older brother leaves, but constantly looks back, he feels very sorry for his brother, but he can’t do anything about it. Besides, he himself was once in the same situation.

Essay Didn't Take You Fishing

Individual scenes from the lives of ordinary people - this is how one can characterize the main themes of the works of the great Russian artist O.V. Popovich. The simplicity of the image, the vivid description of the images of his heroes makes his paintings attractive to the viewer.

The canvas “We Didn’t Take Fishing” is no exception. The plot is simple and understandable. The little boy was not taken fishing by his elders. The boy’s grief knows no bounds, his eyes are about to cry from resentment. The kid is no more than five years old, but he already dreams of fishing with his father and brother. In his hands is a bucket of bait. Most likely, the boy got up earlier than the others and prepared worms for fishing, which the cunning chicken would not mind eating. Judging by the hero’s clothes, we can conclude that the family does not live richly. A white shirt without any decoration, pants with straps so they don’t fall off.

You can understand a child. He dreams of becoming an adult and going after fish like the elders. But they didn’t take him because they considered him still small. Fishing in those days for families was not a pleasure, but an opportunity to get food. Adults devote the whole day to this activity, despite the weather and many insects. Fishing requires attention, perseverance and patience. The boy cannot cope with this yet due to his age.

The older brother feels sorry for the baby. He turned around and sympathetically watched his brother’s reaction. It is possible that he once stood in this place. At the same time, with his posture and demeanor, he wants to show his age; he takes his father as an example. Little sister looks out the door. She doesn’t understand the man’s tragedy, but she smiles, realizing that she will have to calm her brother down.

Finely drawn details are also important in the picture. The territory of the house is fenced with wattle fence. The artist managed to draw every branch in this intricate plexus. Grass with cute little white flowers fills the picture with the smell of rustic nature. A sparrow jumping on the grass gives the picture extraordinary liveliness. With such little things, the author brings the viewer closer to the reality of the event.

Every corner of the work is clearly thought out by the artist. You look at it and understand that everything in it is connected by plot and one detail seems to complement the other. The master’s ability is that his painting does not leave the viewer indifferent. It’s as if a living boy is standing in front of you and you understand the hero’s little grief.

Speech development lesson in 5th grade
Essay - a story based on a drawing by O.V. Popovich
“They didn’t take me fishing.”
Goals:
introduce students to the features of constructing a story based on a role-playing game
drawing;
instill dialogue writing skills;
enrich students’ speech with words related to the theme of the drawing and means of expression
the artist's intentions.
Equipment: computer, screen, presentation.
During the classes.
I. The teacher's word.
Guys, the story is based on some incident, an episode. Remember, we recently wrote
essay “How scared I was.” What incident (episode) formed the basis of this story?
Today in class we will also make up a story, and the basis of this story will be
there will be an episode captured by O.V. Popovich “They didn’t take me fishing.”
II. Conversation on drawing.
Look carefully at the picture and say:
Where and when does the action shown in the picture take place?
In the village, since we can clearly see the fence on which the glench hangs - village
dishes; in summer (green grass, flowers blooming, clothes), most likely morning (otherwise not
It's worth going fishing).
How did the artist show that the father and older brother were going fishing?
The father carries two fishing rods with one hand, and with the other a bag, probably with provisions; on the back
he has a backpack, probably with fishing equipment. In the hands of an elder
the boy has a fishing rod and a backpack on his back, apparently with his own gear.
How does the picture show that the fishermen are leaving?
They are shown in motion, with their backs turned to the baby; elder brother proudly raising
head follows his father.
Who do you think is the main character of the film?
Baby. He is depicted in the center of the picture.
How old do you think he is?
The boy is between 4 and 5 years old. He is short in stature.
How did you guess that the baby was preparing for fishing?
The boy has a fishing rod in his hands, and his bucket of worms lies on the ground.
What is your baby's mood and why?
The baby is in a sad, bad mood. He is very offended, upset, because he is not
took us fishing.
How did the artist show the baby’s distress?
The kid dropped the bucket out of resentment, one end of the fishing rod touched the ground, he covered his face
with one hand to wipe away tears. He stands in a confused pose, covering his eyes with his hand,
pouted. He has red tousled hair, a yellow shirt with red stripes
and brown shorts.
Why didn't you take the baby fishing?
He is still small, he gets tired and may fall into the river.
Who is watching the baby?
The girl is probably his sister. She stands next to him, tries to persuade him to find
I have something else to do, for example, help her pick flowers for a wreath.
Do you like this drawing? How?
It shows a very cute baby. My brother, when he gets offended, he is very
look like him. And I like how the artist depicted the baby’s resentment.
When and how do you think the story began, the moment of which you see on
picture?

This story probably began in the evening, when the baby accidentally heard that
older brother and father are going fishing. He also wanted to go with them and
ran into the garden to dig for worms.
III. Dictionary and stylistic work.
Fishingfishermanfishing equipment (gear);
Fishing rod (fish);
Worm(dig up worms);
Jar(tin can);
Backpack, fence (fence);
Baby (little boy);
Upset, sad, offended;
Offended; offended; offended;
Sadness upset upset upset;
Run after to catch up;
Red hair;
Light green grass;
Drawing, painting;
Artist, O.V. Popovich;
Figure, pose, paint, color, composition.
IV. Situational role-playing game.
Now let’s try to revive this picture: to play out what happened the night before,
what is happening now and what will happen next. We will become participants in the event,
which is shown in the figure. We will play like artists on stage. This will help
make us a story based on the painting “We didn’t take you fishing,” which you then write
Houses.
Artist selection:
Baby….
Father...
Big brother...
Sister...
Author...
The author’s task is to introduce listeners to the circle of those events that
happened in the evening, describe what is shown in the picture (nature, heroes, their
mood).
One of the possible staging options.
Author presenter. One evening, when the whole family had gathered for dinner, the father went out to
porch. He looked up at the sky. There wasn't a single cloud there. The sun has already begun
sit down. The father thought that it would be nice to go fishing in the morning. He entered
house. The children were already sitting at the table. The father approached his eldest son and said...
Father: Kolya, shall we go fishing tomorrow?
Kolya. Let's go, I'll dig up worms after dinner.
Author: Little Andryusha, when he heard about fishing, dropped his spoon and quickly blurted out:
Baby. And I'm with you.
Author: The father smiled and did not answer. Andryusha began to ask his older brother to take
him to go fishing. The baby begged and begged for so long that Kolya could not stand it and promised
take him.
Kolya: Okay, we’ll take you if you wake up early.
Author: Andryusha ran to the garden, dug up worms, prepared a fishing rod and went to bed.
Morning has come. The day promised to be good. The baby woke up from some noise. He
I opened my eyes and saw that my father and brother were already near the fence. Andryusha quickly got up, got dressed,
He grabbed a fishing rod and a bucket and ran after the fishermen.
Baby. Dad, wait, I'm with you. Look what worms I dug up!
Father: No, son, you are still small. When you grow up, you'll come to school with us.
fishing. Stay at home.

Kolya: Andryusha, don’t be offended, we’ll take you fishing another time.
Author: The kid was very offended. He stood there, wiping his tears with his hand. His sister came up to him and
said…
Sister Andryusha, let's go play!
Author. And he was so offended that he didn’t even hear anything. He whispered to himself...
Baby, I tried in vain. I worked so hard, but they... didn’t take it.
Sister Andryusha, come with me to pick flowers. I'll weave a wreath for you.
Author Andryusha agreed. And in the evening I joyfully met my father and brother from fishing.
IV. Compiling a story.
Guys, I suggest you write your own stories based on a given plot, play the role
writer. However, before writing a story, the author must know the laws of its construction.
Let's return to the text of the dramatization again.
Remember what the author said at the very beginning of his speech?
He said that one evening, when the whole family sat down to dinner, the father and
The elder brother agreed to go fishing in the morning.
See. The author began with an introduction to the story and described the situation. Remember when and
how the story began, the moment of which is depicted in the picture.
Little Andryusha found out that his father and brother were going fishing. He decided to go with them
together.
From that moment the action began, and we began to follow its development. This is the beginning.
How did the action develop further? What kind of dialogue (conversation) took place between the baby
and father?
Andryusha prepared worms and a fishing rod, woke up early and asked his father to take him to sleep
fishing, but his father told him to stay at home.
What was this moment like for the baby?
Very tense, he did not expect that he would not be taken fishing.
The most intense moment in the development of an action is called the climax.
The kid was not taken fishing, he was very upset. In this part of the story you will detail
describe the boy’s posture, his mood, his facial expression.
How do you think the action will end?
The baby will soon forget about his offense and will have fun playing with his sister, and when he
When he grows up big, he will also go fishing.
This is the denouement of the action (LOGICAL COMPLETION. The denouement is that part
works in literature in which the hero's fate is reversed. Ends
The outcome is usually the victory or defeat of the main character.)
Now that you are already familiar with the features of story construction, you can
real writers, write a story or script for a picture.
V. Homework.
Write an essay based on the drawing by O.V. Popovich “They didn’t take me fishing.”

The main character of the famous work of the artist Oleg Popovich “They didn’t take me fishing” is a simple village boy. His father and brother go fishing, and he stays with his sister. It won't be easy to go fishing with a little boy, so they decided to leave him at home. When he grows up, they will definitely take him fishing with them, but for now he is still very small.

So, in the foreground of the picture we see a little boy with a very thoughtful and at the same time sad expression on his face. The artist painted him in full height, he managed to masterfully convey on his canvas all the pain and resentment that the guy experiences, since it’s all written on his face. He is incredibly offended by what happened, because he really wanted to go fishing with his father. And the older brother doesn’t seem to care at all about how his brother feels. He is proud to go fishing with his father.

The master very accurately described the difficult family drama; when performing his work, he used mainly bright tones, which perfectly emphasize the essence of this children's tragedy.

Father goes ahead. He has a backpack behind his back and a fishing rod on his shoulder. The older brother looks back, perhaps he expects this guy to go after them. The boy is so upset that he doesn’t even notice how the chicken is pecking at the bait from his bucket. This whole story is very believable and very life-like, the artist was able to depict it in such a way that it also became eternal. Something similar probably happened to each of us in childhood. Using the play of colors, the artist masterfully conveyed the feelings and moods of all the characters in the canvas.

I really liked this picture, it evokes only positive emotions and sympathy for the main character of the canvas, who was not taken fishing.

Along with the article “Essay on the painting “They didn’t take me fishing,” 5th grade (Popovich)” read:

Cool! 51

When you see the drawing “We Didn’t Take You Fishing,” created by illustrator Oleg Vladimirovich Popovich, you first of all pay attention to its plot. After all, it is so simple and bright that it is understandable to every viewer, no matter whether it is an adult or a child.

In the illustration we see that on a sunny summer morning, grabbing fishing rods, the father and eldest son went fishing without taking their younger brother with them. Apparently, the boy really wanted to go with them. In bewilderment and frustration, the younger brother turned away from his relatives leaving for the river. And it seems that the little boy does not look after him so that his father and brother do not notice how he, covering his face with his hand, can barely restrain himself, trying not to cry from insult.

Perhaps the day before, the baby was even promised that he would be taken fishing and, having woken up early, he managed to dig up worms and put them in a small tin bucket. But for a little prank, or simply being afraid for a completely dependent child, the father decided to leave him at home.

The abandoned tin bucket and the fishing rod lying nearby indicate how upset the boy is. Now, the things collected for fishing are not needed and only frustrate the baby even more.

The older sister is bending over the boy and it seems that she is calm, although she sympathizes with her brother. Perhaps she quietly consoles the little boy and explains to him that next time he will be old enough to go fishing with his dad.

In Popovich’s illustration, a house or yard is not visible, but from the fence in the background, one can guess that the father and eldest son, loaded with backpacks, have already left the village courtyard and headed to the fishing spot. The artist seems to have divided his drawing into two plans. One tells us about a little boy and his sister, the other depicts an older brother proudly walking behind his father.

If we talk about the general characteristics of Popovich’s sketch, then this illustration very much reminds us of a painting by Ksenia Uspenskaya-Kologrivova, written several decades earlier. They are even called the same - “We didn’t take you fishing.” Popovich’s drawing, like the painting by Uspenskaya-Kologrivova, depicts the same plot and the same characters. It is even quite possible that it was Ksenia Nikolaevna’s painting that inspired children’s illustrator Popovich to create this ironic and subtle pencil sketch. It’s as if he made a retelling that was easier, more modern and understandable, even for the youngest viewers.

The artist tried to convey in his drawing a simple thought intended for children who strive to become adults as quickly as possible. The idea that you shouldn’t be upset about minor troubles and reasonable prohibitions from older family members. After all, there are many such interesting events and affairs ahead that the grievances that seemed serious and big in childhood, as the years pass, will certainly turn into small, sweet, and even a little funny memories.

Even more essays based on the drawing by O. V. Popovich “They didn’t take me fishing”:

Oleg Vladimirovich Popovich is an illustrator. His drawings have appeared in various publications and books for children. One of the most famous was the drawing (graphics) “They didn’t take me fishing.” In name and theme, it coincides with the famous painting (painting) by the Voronezh artist Ksenia Nikolaevna Uspenskaya-Kologrivova. That painting is in the Tretyakov Gallery and is also called “They didn’t take me fishing.”

Because of the name, confusion often arises; many believe that Popovich is the author of the painting. But he is the author of the drawing. The painting was created in 1955, and the drawing is several decades later. Even the clothes of the heroes speak about this. Although the picture shows it very schematically, it is clear that these are more modern things.

A drawing and a painting have a lot in common, but there are also differences. For example, there are four heroes here and there, one of the heroes is a girl. But in the picture the older boy and his dad are going fishing, and in the drawing there are two older boys. One is a teenager, and the second is an older guy, perhaps a student who came on vacation.

The view of the author of the drawing, Popovich, is ironic, cheerful, the work makes you smile. So, before us is a small scene: two older boys go fishing, but they don’t take the baby with them, although he has already taken out a fishing rod. The baby bursts into tears, but the fishermen do not pay attention to him. The girl tries to console her little brother. A few strokes with colored pencils - and the scene, drawn with the artist’s steady hand, is ready.

Source: seasons-goda.rf

The picture “They didn’t take me fishing” is familiar to all high school students, because in the fifth grade they are offered to write an essay on it. The Russian artist Oleg Popovich, who painted it, devoted his life to creating illustrations for children's magazines and books, so his canvas is more like a simple drawing in Merry Pictures or Murzilka. Let's take a closer look at the picture in order to understand what the master wanted to say with its help.

The description of the painting “They didn’t take it fishing” should begin with the characteristics of its main characters. On the canvas the artist depicted four people: one adult and three children. The main attention is drawn to the smallest character - a boy who looks no more than four years old. He stands and cries bitterly, covering his wet, reddened face with his little hand. It immediately becomes clear to the viewer that the little one hoped to go fishing with his father and older brother, but they did not want to take him with them. The kid hoped to the last that they would take him, he even prepared a fishing rod and a bucket for this purpose and got up early. But dad considered him too small and left him at home under the supervision of his sister. The father is adamant in his decision, and children's tears are not able to pity him. He perfectly understands that in an hour the little one will forget about his morning tragedy and will be carried away by some interesting game.

The protagonist's older brother was much luckier. He looks about 12 years old. He goes fishing with his father and is terribly proud of it. The boy carries a fishing rod in front of him like a precious trophy, and lifts his head high in front of a crying little brother. He has a heavy backpack with gear behind him, but he doesn’t feel its weight. Judging by the boy's reaction, his father is taking him fishing for the first time. This is evidenced by the overly solemn appearance of the character. The boy follows his father and even tries to copy his gait.

The children's father is a serious and intelligent man. These qualities of his are very clearly conveyed by the painting “We Didn’t Take You Fishing.” Popovich portrayed the children's father as focused and oblivious to the baby's tantrum. Dad is completely calm and unperturbed. He remembers whether he took everything with him on fishing, and little things like the whims of his youngest child bother him little. Behind his back he has the same backpack as his eldest son, and in his hands is a yellow shopping bag. The father casually carries the fishing rod on his shoulder.

The fourth heroine of the picture is the boys' sister. She appears to be about eleven years old. The girl is very similar to her older brother. She is not interested in fishing, but she has to get up early to look after the baby. The girl looks at her brother with mockery. She had no doubt that they wouldn’t take him fishing. But the girl does not want to calm the baby down. Tired of his frequent tantrums, she simply watches him, crossing her arms over her chest and carefreely twirling a flower in her palms. The sister knows: as soon as the elders disappear from sight, the baby will stop crying.

When describing Popovich’s painting “They Didn’t Take You Fishing,” you need to pay attention to the objects that surround the characters. To enliven his work, the artist depicted on it an old fence carelessly put together from boards, on which an old clay pot flaunts. From under the heroes’ feet, green grass and small red and blue flowers scatter in different directions. In addition to people, there is another character in the picture - a sparrow. Attracted by the children's cries, he spins around under people's feet, watching the scene with curiosity. Von Popovich left it white. With this approach, he wanted to focus the audience's attention on what was happening, without distracting it with extraneous details.

Judging by the color scheme, it is immediately clear that the painting “We Didn’t Take You Fishing” was written for children of primary and secondary school age. When creating it, Popovich used bright colors (green, yellow, blue, red), which children really like. There is absolutely no black color in the picture, which makes it cheerful, sunny and positive. And even children's tears are not able to spoil this impression.

Source: fb.ru

Looking at Oleg Vladimirovich Popovich’s painting “We Didn’t Take You Fishing,” you involuntarily remember the illustrations on the pages of children’s magazines, as well as books for children. This is not surprising: O. V. Popovich is a famous illustrator who works on the design of publications intended for children.

Characteristic image style, lively, memorable; a little funny, perhaps in some ways a little similar to caricatures. You can just imagine how the author, working on a drawing, smiles, and the smile is kind, warm, like a ray of sunshine.

Of course, the artist loves his heroes, rejoices at their successes, and sympathizes with their mistakes and failures. The plot of the picture will be clear to every viewer, even those who cannot yet read or do not know what the author called the picture. The father and eldest son went fishing together, but did not take the little boy with them. Obviously, he hoped to go with them until the last minute. Maybe they even promised to take him with them if he behaved well, as adults often promise to children, and then they didn’t take him as punishment for some minor offense or simply under the pretext that he was still small.

It can be assumed that the mother forbade taking the boy fishing, fearing that something bad might happen to the child: what if the father and brother became so keen on fishing that at some point they would stop closely monitoring the baby. One way or another, we see that the boy is very upset. He looks after his father and brother as they leave, wiping his tears with his hand. In his other hand the boy holds a fishing rod, which he did not need. An overturned bucket is lying in the grass nearby: probably, a distressed child dropped it or even threw it on purpose to express his protest and indignation.

A girl stands next to the baby - probably her older sister. She leaned towards the child with sympathy; one can assume that she is persuading him not to cry and not to be upset so much - if he behaves well, next time he will definitely be taken fishing. It can be assumed that the youngest boy is about five or six years old, and the older boy and girl are approximately twelve to fourteen years old.

It is difficult to say what the boy is most upset about - the fact that he will not go fishing, or the fact that he was deprived of the opportunity to feel like an adult. Most likely, he has never been fishing before, so he can hardly imagine the pleasure that can be obtained from this activity. But the example of his father and brother, their conversations about fishing, of course, had long interested the kid. After all, everything unfamiliar, especially those related to the world of adults, always attracts children.

Two groups of actors can be distinguished in the composition of the drawing: a father with his eldest son and a sister with a younger brother. The father and eldest son are walking towards the wattle fence: we do not see either the house or the gate, but it is obvious that the characters in the picture are about to leave the yard. The artist depicted his characters in motion. It is interesting to note an interesting detail - the movements of both, father and son, are almost the same. It can be assumed that the boy copies his father’s behavior, trying to look mature and serious, a real fisherman. Both do not pay attention to the indignation of the baby. However, from the expressions on their faces, it can be assumed that the father is doing this so that the baby will stop crying faster, or is simply absorbed in thoughts about the upcoming fishing. The brother defiantly ignores the behavior of the younger brother, carried away by imitating his father. But the father smiles good-naturedly, looking ahead, and his eldest son defiantly turned away from the baby, raising his chin.

The commonality of the compositional group “father - eldest son” is emphasized by such details as identical green backpacks, although the boy has a slightly smaller backpack, and also by the fact that both are carrying fishing rods. The father carries two fishing rods on his shoulder, the son holds the fishing rod vertically. Although the baby also has a fishing rod in his hands, it does not stand out from the general background, since he lowered it down.

The other group is a girl and a baby. If you look carefully at the drawing, this group can easily be fit into an imaginary triangle, in the lower right corner of which there will be a bucket thrown by the baby. The girl looks at the baby. She is probably consoling him, but the expression on her face suggests that she considers the reason for his tears to be frivolous. She does not try to caress the upset child; on the contrary, she folds her arms over her chest and carefreely twirls a flower in her fingers. If she calms the child, it is more so that he does not interfere with his crying.

Not least important for creating a holistic composition are such details as the outlines of the fence, clear in the right side of the corner and blurred in the distance, as well as the strip of grass along which the characters depicted by the artist walk and stand. In order to enliven the image and make it more realistic, the artist also used a number of small but expressive details: an inverted cast iron pot on one of the fence stakes, childishly drawn red and blue flowers in the grass, and a sparrow about to take flight.

The artist used bright colors, which is quite justified if you keep in mind that the painting is intended for children. On it we can easily find four primary colors: green, yellow, red and blue. In addition to them, the artist also used other colors: different shades of reddish-brown (the father's and the little boy's trousers, the father's boots, the girl's shoes and the cast iron on the fence), gray (the older boy's sweater and bucket), grayish-brown (the fence).

As noted, father and son both have green backpacks; a lighter tone is used to depict grass. In the picture, the bag the father is carrying in his hands and the baby’s T-shirt with narrow red stripes are yellow. The girl's red blouse and the older boy's slippers; Father's cap has a red side. The older boy's jeans are bright blue; The girl's skirt is a darker shade. The hair of the man and the boys is approximately the same shade, dark brown, but in the boys it has a slightly noticeable reddish tint; The girl has red hair. It should be noted that the artist did not add tone to the faces; he only outlined the blush on the cheeks. The main background is a white sheet of paper.

Popovich - Didn't take me fishing

O. Popovich is one of the artists closest to the Russian spirit. In his paintings he depicts those familiar situations that everyone has encountered more than once in life.

The painting “We Didn’t Take You Fishing” is one of these. The artist painted on canvas a very typical situation - a small child is upset because adults did not take him with him.

In the foreground of the picture is the main character - a boy of four or five years old. He is dressed in a simple canvas shirt and pants, which, due to his small age, are held on by straps. The child's face was frozen with resentment - one of the most unpleasant feelings a person can experience. The boy is “pouting” and is about to cry.

The main character of the picture

The reason for the boy’s reaction is clear: his older brother and father went fishing, and he, in their opinion, was too small, and was left at home. The thought that adults are mistaken is probably frozen in his head - he is already old enough. The boy even got ready himself, dug up some worms, and woke up early. But we know how difficult it is to wake up early, especially for a child!

It’s just dawn outside, as evidenced by the long shadows, but the villagers are no longer sleeping. The adults go about their business, because the morning is the best time to do the housework, because it will be hot later and it will be hard to work.
They go fishing all day. This entails many inconveniences and difficulties. You will need to walk a lot and spend time in the sun. There are always a lot of mosquitoes near bodies of water, which can irritate even the most reserved person. In addition, fishing requires a lot of patience and perseverance, which young children do not yet have.
Therefore, we can safely say that the main character of the film was not taken not because he was guilty, and not out of malice. The child is just too young.

Older brother and father

The elder brother, who walks behind his father, still remembers the feelings that his brother experiences. He still has fresh memories of how he himself stood at the house and cried from resentment. Therefore, we can see sympathy on the elder brother's face. The girl in the pink dress peeking out from behind the door of the house is smiling. She doesn't know what the boy is experiencing. Her face expresses curiosity. Probably, as soon as the fishermen leave, she will approach her brother and try to calm him down.

This picture is very sad, but imbued with realism. I feel very sorry for the main character, but I understand that the adults couldn’t take him with them, couldn’t do anything differently. But nothing! A few more years will pass, and this blond boy will go fishing with his father and brother.

5th grade

• Essay describing the painting After the rain. Ples Levitana

  One of the best paintings by I.I. Levitan “After the rain. Ples” (1886) was conceived during the artist’s trip to the Kostroma province. She, like other landscape painter’s compositions written on the Volga