Why is Chatsky doomed to loneliness? "Woe from Wit" A.S. Griboyedov. Why Chatsky is doomed to loneliness (composition) Why Chatsky is doomed to loneliness

The question of why Chatsky is doomed to loneliness is fundamental for understanding not only the character of this hero, but also the meaning of the entire comedy "Woe from Wit" as a whole. This character from the very beginning of his appearance on the stage attracts the attention of readers, spectators, as well as everyone around him with his outstanding, caustic and sharp mind, unusual sense of humor and boldness of judgment. By this he stands out sharply among the representatives of the old patriarchal Moscow society. This review will show exactly how this character differed from the rest of the characters in the comedy, which ultimately determined the fact that he never had a single like-minded person or supporter.

Character

In order to understand why Chatsky is doomed to loneliness, you first need to pay attention to his personality. This young man is cheerful, witty and sociable.

He is extremely observant, immediately notices the slightest flaws in those around him and immediately ridicules them evilly. In addition, Alexander Andreevich not only observes, but also discusses everything he has seen and heard. He analyzes not only the actions of the people around him, but makes judgments about entire phenomena of social life. Already at least one of these reasons shows why Chatsky is doomed to loneliness. None of those around him liked his criticism of the noble way of life.

But the most important difference between the hero and other characters was that he was too active, emotional and enterprising, while the rest of the characters are presented as people leading a fairly measured lifestyle.

Education

In the upbringing of Alexander Andreevich, one should look for the reasons why Chatsky is doomed to loneliness. From his very first appearance, readers and viewers understand that this man is well-read and very educated.

The hero closely follows socio-political events, he is clearly interested in literature and philosophical teachings, which developed in him a critical mind and powers of observation. Representatives of the Famus society believed that reading books harms the formation of personality. The hero is very skeptical about the education of his contemporary society.

Behavior

The question of why Chatsky is doomed to loneliness in the comedy "Woe from Wit" probably worried anyone who read this work by Griboyedov. The answer can be found in the actions of the protagonist. So, from the very beginning he is too self-confident, which prevents him from seeing Sophia's change towards him, who is the only one from the entire Famus society who could understand him. But Chatsky ridiculed Molchalin too evilly, to whom the girl was not indifferent, which turned her against him. From the very first appearance, the hero begins to sting and criticize the lifestyle of not only the old, but also the younger generation, which led to the final conflict.

Comparison with society

To answer the question of why Chatsky is doomed to loneliness (with quotes, students will be better able to solve this problem) should be in the context of comparing him with the rest of the characters in the work. The hero's statements clearly show his difference from the old Moscow society.

Those whom he so maliciously ridicules throughout the work lived according to ancient traditions, which assumed unconditional submission to superiors. This habit of unconditional obedience was the reason for the famous phrase: "I would be glad to serve, it is sickening to serve." Representatives of the Famus society are conservatives by nature: they do not like any changes and try to preserve old customs. None of them accepts the views expressed by the hero. They are even frightened by the rapid flight of his thoughts, they prefer to remain on their native, familiar soil, which also causes ridicule from the hero, who expresses himself about them like this: “Houses are new, and prejudices are old.” Thus, the author emphasizes the fundamental difference between his character and the people around him. The same can be said about the relationship of the hero with Sophia, who clearly stands out among other characters with her extraordinary mind and independence of thought. However, the girl was not ready for the too bold character of her fan and his too bold looks.

Plan

In conclusion, we should sum up the reasons for the loneliness of the protagonist. It is best to list them point by point, since this form of presentation allows the student to systematize the material covered.

Reasons for Chatsky's discord with the famuslov society:

1. The independent nature of the hero, the courage of his judgments, a critical view of the world around him.
2. The education of the protagonist, which strikingly distinguished him from the representatives of the old generation.
3. Bold behavior of the character in the light.
4. Divergence of views with representatives of Moscow society.

So, the topic "Why is Chatsky doomed to loneliness", the plan of which is presented above, is the key to the study of Griboyedov's comedy.

In human society, the majority plays a huge role, it is almost impossible to resist the crowd, so the image of Chatsky, who has taken on the role of a warrior, but is still alone, is tragic.

In A.S. Griboyedov’s comedy “Woe from Wit”, out of 20 characters, only A.A. Chatsky is a positive hero. He opposes his views to the entire Famus society, not finding understanding, is forced to leave Moscow. What lies at the basis of the contradiction between Chatsky and Famusovsky society?

First, it is a different view of education. Famusov believes that all evil lurks in the sciences and education: "If evil is to be stopped: / Take away all the books, but burn them."

Skalozub claims: “I will make you happy: a general rumor, / That there is a project about lyceums, schools, gymnasiums; / There they will only teach in our way: one, two; / And the books will be saved like this: for big occasions.". But Chatsky, on the contrary, sees a boon for Russia in education, perhaps that is why he spent several years in Europe, gaining "mind and reason". Secondly, the characters look differently at the way of life and its meaning. For Famusov, Skalozub and other representatives of the "old Moscow" service is above all. But by “service” they mean the ability to get the “golden key” (the title of chamberlain is the highest rank at court). For Famusov, an authoritative person is Maxim Petrovich, who was granted the highest smile for a quick fall in front of the empress, followed by a promotion. Skalozub, without taking part in any battle, practically rose to the rank of general. No wonder Lisa says about him: "And the golden bag, and aims for the generals." But Chatsky "would be glad to serve," but he was "sickening to serve." For he, just like Starodum from Fonvizin's predecessor comedy "Undergrowth", sees the meaning of his existence in serving the fatherland, and not individuals. But if they have some opinion of their own, then the rest, like Molchalin, generally believe that they have no right to judge such things: “In my years, you should not dare / have your own judgment.” In addition, the acuteness of the problem lies in the fact that the Famus society consists of people in whom even little human is left, they have few moral qualities. Chatsky himself sees who is preferred in this world, and says: "The silent ones are blissful in the world." And people like Chatsky, the Famus society is trying to expel, so that nothing interferes with a calm and familiar life. Yes, if a person lives, guided only by personal benefits, knows how to keep silent in time, “stroke a pug”, raise a handkerchief - he is “his own”!

Strengthens the tragedy of the image of Chatsky and the love line of the play. Sophia, being a smart girl, prefers Chatsky to Molchalin, the same Molchalin who managed to please everyone. And, of course, Alexander Andreevich cannot understand why she made such a choice: “Why am I more stupid than Mochalina?” His love for Sophia is so great that he cannot even believe her words, he needs to see for himself everything. And he is convinced that Sophia, having been in the Famus society for so long, has become the bearer of his traits. Sophia's coldness, her dislike for him, and even the slander that she launched, dealt a strong blow to Chatsky's heart.

Nevertheless, it is impossible to argue that Chatsky is absolutely alone in comedy. After all, Skalozub says about his brother: “... he has firmly gained some new rules. / Chin followed him; he suddenly left the service, / In the village he began to read books. And Mrs. Khlestova talks about her nephew: “Professors! - our relatives studied with them, / And he left! even now to the pharmacy, as an apprentice. / Runs away from women, and even from me! / Officials do not want to know! He is a chemist, he is a botanist, / Prince Fedor, my nephew. Despite the fact that these faces do not appear on stage, it still becomes clear that Chatsky is not alone in his aspirations.

Thus, we see that the rejection from society and the rejection of the beloved make the image of Chatsky tragically lonely, but able to resist in the war. The appearance of people of his type gives hope for an emerging change in the public consciousness of Russians in the 19th century.

Chatsky is a young, educated nobleman who has returned from a three-year journey. He is not rich, although he belongs to a “famous family”. He spent his childhood in Moscow, in the house of Famusov, a friend of his late father; here he grew up and became friends with Sophia. We do not know where and what kind of education Chatsky received, but we see that this is an enlightened person. Chatsky returned to Moscow to Famusov's house because he loves Sophia. “A little light”, without stopping home, he promptly appears in Famusov’s house and expresses his ardent love to Sophia. This already characterizes him as an ardent, passionate person. Neither separation nor wanderings cooled his feelings, which he expresses poetically, passionately. Chatsky's speech is emotional, there are frequent exclamations, questions: Oh, my God! Am I here again, In Moscow! ... Chatsky is smart, eloquent, his speech is witty and apt. Sophia says about him: Sharp, smart, eloquent. Famusov recommends Chatsky: ... he is small with a head And writes and translates gloriously ... A number of aphorisms testify to the sharp and subtle mind of Chatsky: “Blessed is he who believes, he is warm in the world”, “Mind and heart are not in harmony”. Chatsky stands for true enlightenment. He passionately proclaims: Now let one of us, From young people, there is an enemy of searches, Without demanding either places or promotion, He will put his mind into science, hungry for knowledge ... The image of Chatsky is new, fresh, bringing changes to life society. He despises hypocrisy, inhuman treatment of the people. For him, love is sacred. He "does not know deceit and believes in the chosen dream." And therefore, with such pain, he experiences the disappointment that befell him when he found out that Sofia loves another, that is, Molchalin. Chatsky is alone in Famusov's house. Everyone turned away from him, calling him crazy. The Famus society sees the cause of his madness in enlightenment: Learning is the plague, learning is the reason, What is now more than ever, Crazy divorced people, and deeds, and opinions. Chatsky was forced to leave Famusov's house. He is defeated because the forces were unequal. But in turn, he gave a good rebuff to the "past" century. Chatsky also speaks indignantly about serfdom. In the monologue “Who are the judges? ... ”he angrily opposes the oppressors: Where, show us, fathers of the fatherland, Whom we should take as models? Are not these rich in robbery? They found protection from court in friends, in kinship, Building magnificent chambers, Where they overflow in feasts and extravagance, And where foreign clients will not resurrect The meanest features of the past life. Chatsky believes that it is necessary to serve not to persons, but to the cause. He sees the value of a person in his personal merits. The image of Chatsky showed us what a real person should be. He is the one that people should imitate.

The comedy "Woe from Wit" was written in those distant times, when people such as Chatsky A.A., the protagonist of the work of A.S. Griboyedov "Woe from Wit", brought new moods and ideas to society.

The person, in whose image Chatsky was, wanted to show a person inspired by lofty ideas, raising a revolt against society in defense of freedom, reason and art, cultivating a completely new morality, creating a new view of the world and human relationships.

Alexander Andreevich Chatsky is a man in his prime, a nobleman. Chatsky's parents died quite early, and he was forced to be brought up in the house of Famusov, a friend of his late father. Chatsky was very smart. He defended the right of a person to freedom of choice of occupation: to travel, relax in the countryside, read smart books or devote himself to “creative art, which he considered high and beautiful,” so Famusov believes that Chatsky is a dangerous person who does not recognize any authorities.

Chatsky does not like everything vulgar, as well as slavish admiration for all foreigners, servility, servility and other nonsense. His desire is to serve the Fatherland, labor, and not selective individuals. Being a true patriot, Chatsky most of all wanted to pay his debt to the Fatherland, sought to honestly serve him. It was because of this that he left Sophia and went to the city of Petersburg. With this, a brilliantly started career ended: “I would be glad to serve - it’s sickening to serve.” And the state, oddly enough, needs servitude. Chatsky thinks that there are only people around him who are looking only for high ranks, crosses, money, not love, but a profitable marriage. Their ideal is "moderation and accuracy", their goal is "to take all the books to burn."

One of the most important properties of Chatsky is the fullness of feelings. It manifested itself both in the way he loves, and, no less, in the way he is angry and hates. In everything he shows passion, is often a fiery soul. He is fiery, sharp, intelligent, eloquent, impatient and yet full of life. All these qualities make him open to mistakes and a vulnerable person.
Chatsky, without a doubt, is the only positive character in Griboedov's comedy.

Chatsky finds himself in an environment where he cannot be understood. And his views are not only not appreciated, but rejected, and moreover, persecuted. He is lonely and suffers, "a million torments" falls to his lot in one day.

Chatsky bursts into the sleepy silence of the Famusovs' house like a whirlwind, but his stormy joy, ringing and uncontrollable laughter, sincere tenderness from the heart, and ardent indignation, which are completely out of place in a house where everything is built on deceit and pretense. Chatsky's behavior causes misunderstanding, which then develops into irritation. He is sincere in everything: both in joy and in indignation.

Seagull alone. He himself is to blame for his loneliness. He lacks the flexibility of mind and cunning to adapt to the society in which he lives. His not very beautiful behavior and manner of behaving and speaking out at the ball turned society against him. By his behavior, he was known not as an intelligent person, but as a madman. I would not call Chatsky an absolutely positive hero of A. S. Griboedov’s comedy “Woe from Wit”.