Dugin Alexander Gelievich

Alexander Gelevich Dugin (born January 7, 1962, Moscow, USSR) is a Russian public figure, philosopher, political scientist and translator, sociologist, leader of the International Eurasian Movement, editor-in-chief of the Tsargrad TV channel.

1982-1984 work as a translator (English, French, German) at the Institute of Market Research and Demand, Trade Information Institute.

1987 - the beginning of participation in socio-political organizations, writing the first books and articles. Creation of an intellectual neo-Eurasian movement, formulation of the foundations of neo-Eurasianism.

1989 - publication in the journal "Soviet Literature" of the program texts "Continent of Russia", "Subconsciousness of Eurasia", "The End of the Proletarian Era", etc.

1988 - 1991 - Work as the editor-in-chief of the EON publishing center, Translations from the French "L" erreur spirite "by R. Guenon. Participation in international conferences (Paris, Madrid).

1990 - publication of the book "Ways of the Absolute". Creation of the Historical and Religious Association "ARKTOGEYA", President of the IRA "ARKTOGEYA". Release of the books "Rusia Misterio de Eurasia" (Spain) and "Continente Russia" (Italy).

Since 1991 - editor-in-chief of the magazine "Elements"

1992 - reading a course of lectures on geopolitics at the Military Academy of the General Staff. Editor-in-chief of the magazine "Elements". (1992-2000). Lecture course "Russian cosmism, traditionalism, spiritualism" at the Sorbonne University (Paris). Publication of the book "Hyperborean Theory".

1993 - 1995 - columnist of the newspaper "New Look"

1993 - a series of hour-long programs on ORT (Public Russian Television) "Secrets of the Century". The publication of the book "Conspirology".

1994 - book "Conservative Revolution". Series of lectures Paris-Barcelona-Milan-Rome: "European tour". The French magazine Actuelle (M43/44/45, summer 1994) calls Dugin "the most influential thinker of the post-communist era"; cooperates with political movements - the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, the Liberal Democratic Party, the NBP; actively works with youth; takes part in scientific conferences.

1996 - the book "Templars of the Proletariat". Start of work on the Internet, creation of the Arctogaia website (www.arctogaia.com)

1997 - publication of the textbook "Fundamentals of Geopolitics". Weekly hourly literary and philosophical radio programs FINIS MUNDI (FM, Radio 101).

1998 - publication of a scientific collection on the history of religions "End of the World", monographs "Metaphysics of the Good News", "Mysteries of Eurasia".

1998-2003 - Advisor to the Chairman of the State Duma of the Russian Federation. The second edition of the Foundations of Geopolitics. Weekly programs on Radio Free Russia Geopolitical Review.

1998 - 1999 participation in the St. Petersburg Economic Forum. 1999 - presentation of the conceptual project "OUR WAY" within the framework of the FORUM. The release of the book "Absolute Motherland".

1998-1999 lecture course "Traditionalism as a language" within the "NEW UNIVERSITY". Graduated from the correspondence department of the Novocherkassk Academy with a degree in Economics.

1999-2000 - Teaching the course "Philosophy of Politics" at MNEPU (International Ecological and Political University). Honorary member of the "Economic and Philosophical Assembly" at the TsOS MSU. The third and fourth (updated) editions of the Fundamentals of Geopolitics.

2000 -- creation of OPOD "Eurasia", Chairman of the Political Council. Chairman of the Center for Geopolitical Expertise under the Chairman of the State Duma of the Russian Federation (sector of the Expert Advisory Council on National Security Issues). Publication of the monograph "Russian Thing" in 2 volumes. PhD thesis defense in the specialty "Philosophy of Science" - "Evolution of the Paradigmal Foundations of Science" at the SKNTS (Rostov-on-Don)

2002 - transformation of the OPOD "Eurasia" into the political party "Eurasia". Chairman of the Political Council of the Eurasia Party. Opening

Eurasian Internet portal evrazia.org. The publication of the books "Evolution of the Paradigmatic Foundations of Science" and "Philosophy of Traditionalism". Participation as a leading expert-analyst in the Expert Council of the Directorate of Channel One.

2003 -- Creation of the International "Eurasian Movement", Leader of the Movement and Chairman of the Eurasian Committee. Opening of the philosophical portal arcto.ru. Assignment of the title of honorary professor of the Eurasian National University. L. Gumilev (Astana).

2004 - Doctoral thesis defense "Transformation of political structures and institutions in the process of modernization of traditional society" in Rostov-on-Don. Resumption of lectures at the "NEW UNIVERSITY". The publication of the books "Philosophy of Politics", "Project Eurasia", "Eurasian Mission of Nursultan Nazarbayev", "Philosophy of War". Release of translations of the book "Fundamentals of Geopolitics" in Turkish, Arabic and Serbian. Participation of a group (11 representatives, 5 large cities) under the leadership of A.G. Dugin as public observers in the parliamentary elections of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Participation in the summit of the heads of the EurAsEC countries in Astana (June 23, 2004) and presentation at it with a keynote report "On the role of Eurasianism in the integration processes in the post-Soviet space." Meetings and interviews with the President of Kazakhstan N. Nazarbayev. Publication of articles, interviews, comments and analytical expertise in the Russian and foreign press - including as a columnist in the newspapers Izvestia, Krasnaya Zvezda, Literaturnaya Gazeta, Komsomolskaya Pravda, Arguments and Facts.

2005 - Editor-in-Chief of the Orthodox TV channel SPAS. Host of the weekly analytical program "Milestones". Visit to Washington. Speeches at the US State Department, the Hopkins Institute, polemics with Z. Brzezinski, F. Fukuyama and others. The Eurasian Forum is being held in Turkey with the participation of the former President of Turkey S. Demirel and the President of Northern Cyprus R. Denktash. Speeches in the national press and on TV in Turkey outlining Eurasian positions. The growing popularity of Eurasian geopolitical ideas (the union of Moscow-Iran-Turkey) in the Turkish General Staff. Meeting with Generals Vali Kuchuk and Tuncer Kylynch. Creation of the "Eurasian Union of Youth".

2006 -- Publication of the book "Pop Culture and the Signs of the Times". Publication in Russian of the book by the French writer J. Parvulesco "Vladimir Putin - a man of destiny" (with comments and foreword by Dugin). Vice-speaker of the Federation Council A. Torshin, head of the international policy committee of the Federation Council M. Margelov, Minister of Culture of the Russian Federation A. Sokolov, and other state and public figures enter the Supreme Council of the international "Eurasian Movement". Teaching at the Faculty of Philosophy of Moscow State University - the course "Postphilosophy".

2007 - Active participation as an expert and public figure on the central TV channels of the Russian Federation (First, NTV, TVC). By order of the Administration of the President of the Russian Federation, a textbook on social science was written. Dugin has been declared persona non grata in Ukraine for his anti-American remarks. Beginning of regular interaction with the Russian Foreign Ministry, meeting with Minister of Foreign Affairs S. Lavrov. Weekly program "Russian Thing" on the radio Russian News Service. Publication of the book "Postmodern Geopolitics"

2008 -- Publication of the book "Postphilosophy", "Radical Subject and its Double". Series of lectures "Archeomodern". Preparing a course of lectures at the Faculty of Sociology of Moscow State University.

2009 - teaching special courses "Structural Sociology" (sociology of imagination), "Sociology of Russian society", courses "Sociology of geopolitical processes", "Ethnosociology" at the Faculty of Sociology of Moscow State University; organization of a series of television lectures on Eurasia-TV; publication of the Russian Time magazine (editor-in-chief); presentations with a course of lectures at the Southern Federal University (Rostov-on-Don), at St. Petersburg State University (Faculty of Philosophy); visit to the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic, meeting with the President of the PMR I. Smirnov; publication of the books "Postphilosophy", "Radical Subject and its Double", "The Fourth Political Theory"; preparation for publication, preface and commentaries of Alain de Benoit's book Against Liberalism.

2010 - appointment as Acting Head of the Department of Sociology of International Relations of the Faculty of Sociology of Moscow State University. M.V. Lomonosov, reading lecture courses, working at the Central Research Institute (Center for Conservative Studies), publishing journals, extensive expert and journalistic activities.

2011 - publication of the books "Sociology of Russian Society" and "Martin Heidegger and the Possibility of Russian Philosophy"

2012 -- A. Dugin was appointed a member of the Committee of Advisors under the Chairman of the State Duma S. Naryshkin

2011 - 2014 - work at the Faculty of Sociology of Moscow State University. M.V. Lomonosov as head of the Department of Sociology of International Relations. Doctoral thesis defense in sociology (on the topic "Sociology of the Imagination"). Development of a number of courses and special courses on the sociology of politics, international relations, ethnosociology, politics of national relations. Conducting seminars of the Center for Conservative Studies and publishing annual conceptual collections on the sections "Tradition", "Deconstruction", "Ethnosociology", etc. Publication of the books "Ethnosociology", "The Theory of a Multipolar World", "Geopolitics of Russia", "Sociology of Imagination". The publication of the first volumes of the Noomachia cycle" - "In Search of the Dark Logos", "Three Logoses"

since 2015 - editor-in-chief of the conservative TV channel "Tsargrad", publication of the books of the cycle on the history and paradigmatics of cultures and civilizations "Noomachia" in 12 volumes

Monographs and textbooks in Russian:

• Monograph "Ways of the Absolute". M., 1990;
• Monograph "Conspiracy". M., Arktogeya, ROF "Eurasia", 1992, 2005. ISBN 5-85928-010-6, ISBN 5-902322-03-0
• Monograph "Hyperborean theory". M., 1993;
• Monograph "The Conservative Revolution". M., 1994;
• Monograph "The Templars of the Proletariat". M., 1996;
• Monograph "Mysteries of Eurasia". M., 1996;
• Monograph "Metaphysics of the Good News". M., 1996;
• Monograph "Fundamentals of Geopolitics". M., 1997, 1999, 2000, 2001 (translated into French, Romanian, Serbian, Georgian, Italian, Spanish and English);
• Monograph "Absolute Homeland". M., 1999;
• Our way . M., 1999 - The Eurasian path. M., 2002;
• Monograph "Russian Thing". In 2 t. M., 2001;
• Monograph "Evolution of the paradigmatic foundations of science". M., 2002; .
• Monograph "Philosophy of Traditionalism" (Lectures of the "New University"). M., 2002;
• Textbook "Fundamentals of Eurasianism". M., 2002;
• Monograph Project "Eurasia". M., 2004;
• Monograph "Nursultan Nazarbayev's Eurasian mission". M., 2004. ISBN 9785902322016
• Monograph "Philosophy of Politics". M., 2004;
• Monograph "Philosophy of War". M., 2004;
• Monograph "Conspiracy". M., 2005;
• "Pop culture and signs of the times", M., Amphora, 496 p., 2005. ISBN 5-94278-903-7
• Project "Eurasia", M., 2006;
• Textbook "Social Studies for Citizens of New Russia" M., 2007. ISBN 978-5-90359-03-2
• Monograph "Postmodern Geopolitics" M., Amphora, 384 pp., 2007. 978-5-367-00616-2
• “Signs of the Great Nord. Hyperborean theory. Veche, M., 2008 (Reprint of the Hyperbrean Theory). ISBN 978-5-9533-3352-8
• Monograph "Postphilosophy" M., 2009.
• Monograph "Radical subject and its double" M., 2009.
• Monograph "The Fourth Political Theory" M.: Amphora, 2009.
• Structural Sociology Textbook. - M.: Academic project, 2010.
• Textbook “Logos and Mythos. Deep Regional Studies". - M.: Academic project, 2010.
• Monograph "Crisis: The End of Economic Theory" M., 2010.
• Monograph "Martin Heidegger: The Philosophy of Another Beginning". - M.: Academic project, 2010.
• Textbook “Sociology of Russian Society. Russia between Chaos and Logos". - M.: Academic project, 2010.
• Textbook "Sociology of the Imagination". - M.: Academic project, 2010.
• Monograph "Martin Heidegger: The Possibility of Russian Philosophy". - M.: Academic project, 2011.
• Monograph "Archeomodern", 2011.
• Textbook "Geopolitics". - M.: Academic project, 2011.
• Textbook "Ethnosociology". - M.: Academic project, 2011.
• Textbook "Sociology of geopolitical processes", M., 2011.
• Textbook "Geopolitics of Russia". - M.: Academic project, Gaudeamus, 2012. - 424 p. - (Gaudeamus). - 1000 copies, ISBN 978-5-8291-1398-8, ISBN 978-5-98426-122-7.
• Monograph "Theory of a multipolar world", M., 2012.
• Monograph "In Search of the Dark Logos", M., 2012. - 516 p. ISBN 978-5-8291-1426-8
• Textbook “International Relations. Paradigms, theory, sociology”, M., Academic project, 2014. ISBN 978-5-8291-1659-0
• USA and the New World Order. co-authored with Olavo de Carvalho, Vide, 2013.
• Monograph "The Fourth Way". - M., 2014. - 683 p. ISBN 978-5-8291-1625-5.
• Monograph “Martin Heidegger. The Last God. - M.: Academic project, 2014. - 846 p. - .
• Eurasian revenge of Russia. - M., Algorithm, 256 p., 2014. ISBN 978-5-4438-0855-0
• "Imagination. Philosophy, sociology, structures”, M., Academic project, 2015. ISBN 978-5-8291-1828-0
• Russian war. - M., Algorithm, 272 p., 2015. ISBN 978-5-09-067988-7-9
• Martin Heidegger. Metapolitics. Eschatology of being. - Academic Project, 2016. ISBN: 978-5-8291-1797-9.

Noomachia Series

• Monograph “Noomachia: Wars of the Mind. Three Logoi: Apollo, Dionysus, Cybele. - M.: Academic project, 2014. - 447 p. ISBN 978-5-8291-1594-4
• Monograph “Noomachia: Wars of the Mind. Frontier civilizations: Russia, American civilization, Semites and their civilization, Arabic Logos, Turanian Logos. - M.: Academic project, 2014. - 694 p. 978-5-8291-1634-7.
• Monograph “Noomachia: Wars of the Mind. Logos of Europe: Mediterranean Civilization in Time and Space. - M.: Academic project, 2014. - 530 p. 978-5-8291-1633-0.
• Monograph “Noomachia: Wars of the Mind. On the other side of the West. Indo-European Civilizations: Iran, India". - M.: Academic project, 2014. - 495 p. ISBN 978-5-8291-1656-9.
• Monograph “Noomachia: Wars of the Mind. On the other side of the West. China, Japan, Africa, Oceania. - M.: Academic project, 2014. - 551 p. ISBN 978-5-8291-1657-6.
• Monograph “Noomachia. Mind Wars. German logo. Apophatic man." - M.: Academic project, 2015. - 639 p. ISBN 978-5-8291-1772-6
• Monograph “Noomachia. Mind Wars. French logo. Orpheus and Melusina. - M.: Academic project, 2015. - 439 p. ISBN 978-5-8291-1796-2
• Monograph “Noomachia: Wars of the Mind. England or Britain? Maritime Mission and the Positive Subject". - M.: Academic project, 2015. - 595 p. 978-5-8291-1795-5
• Monograph “Noomachia: Wars of the Mind. Latin logo. Sun and Cross. - M.: Academic project, 2016. - 719 p. ISBN 978-5-8291-1859-4.
• Monograph “Noomachia: Wars of the Mind. Hellenic logo. Valley of Truth". - M.: ISBN 978-1593680381
  • Dugin Iskander Feisaliny jeopolitidgi, Beyruth, 2004.
  • Alexander Dugin. Die Vierte Politische Theorie, Arktos, 2013. ISBN 978-1-907166-62-4
  • Alexander Dugin. Konflikte der Zukunft. Die Rückkehr der Geopolitik., 2014. ISBN 978-3887412913
  • Alexander Dugin. Baron Ungern von Sternberg - der letzte Kriegsgott. Junge Forum Nr. 7, 2007. ISBN 978-3937129327
  • Alexander Dugin. Evola von Links: Metaphysisches Weltbild und antibürgerlicher Geist, Regin-Verlag, 2006. ISBN 978-3937129273

  French

  • Alexandre Douguin. L'Empire soviétique et les nationalismes à l'époque de la pérestroïka, in XXX, Nation et Empire, GRECE, 1991.
  • Alexandre Douguin. Le prophète de l'eurasisme, Avatar Éditions, 2006. ISBN 978-0954465278
  • Dughin A. Russia. Misterio de Eurasia. Madrid, 1992.
  • Alexander Dugin. Eurasia. La rivoluzione conservatrice in Russia, Pagine, 2015. ISBN 978-8875574574
  • Alexander Dugin, Alexander Benoist. Eurasia, Vladimir Putin e la grande politica, Controcorrente, 2014. ISBN 978-8898000036
  • Alexander Dugin. Russia segreta, Edizioni all'insegna del veltro, 2013. ASIN B00DW22LEQ

  Spanish

  • Alexander Dugin. "Rusica/ Misterio de Eurasia". Madrid, 1990;

  Portuguese

  • Alexander Dugin. Teoria do Mundo Multipolar, IAEG, 2012. ASIN B01FKTSRXM
  • Alexander Dugin. Geopolitica da Russia Contemporanea, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2015. ISBN 978-1518610394
  • Alexander Dugin. A Grande Guerra dos Continentes, Antagonista Editora, 2011. ASIN B004YR14WS
  • Alexander Dugin. Eurasianismo: Ensaios Selecionados, Zarinha Centro Cultura, 2012. ISBN 978-8599972137
  • Alexandre Dugin, Olavo de Carvalho. Os Eua e a Nova Ordem Mundial, VIDE Editorial, 2013. ASIN B00GTQ49GU
  • Aleksandr Dugin, Antonio Bessa, Sonia Sebastiao. Finis Mundi: A Ultima Cultura #6, Instituto de Altos Estudos em Geopolitica e Ciencias Auxiliares, 2013. ASIN B00B9AS9FS

  Serbian

  • Dugin A. Nova Hyperboreyska Revelyatsiya, Beograd, 1999.
  • Dugin A. Conspirologiya, Beograd, 2001.
  • Dugin A. Osnove geopolitike, Beograd, 2004.

  Turkish

  • Dugin A. Rus jeopolitigi avrasyaci yaklasim. Ankara, 2003.
  • Dugin A. Moska-Ankara aksiaynin, Istanbul, 2007.
  • Dugin A. Misyonin avrasyagilik Nursultanain Nazarbaevin, Ankara, 2006.

Much of what we supposedly know about Stalin is fiction.

At the mention of the name of STALIN today, passions immediately flare up. The playwright Edward RADZINSKY also decided to contribute to this dispute and published three books of a biographical novel about the leader in a year. We asked the historian Alexander DUGIN, who has worked in the archives for over 30 years, to evaluate the brainchild of the TV presenter.

- Alexander Nikolayevich, what surprised you the most about Radzinsky?

Militant incompetence. And the fact that he is honest in his novel in only one thing - in pathological hatred of the individual Stalin. I'm not ashamed to even imagine Joseph Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili parricide. This slander is just the beginning of a three-headed monster novel Radzinsky. The author did not even think to back it up with facts, although he claims that he even had access to the presidential archive. But not a single state archive, including the KGB archive, has his signature on the records of the use of archival files. And without it, not a single folder will be given to anyone. Radzinsky simply used the achievements of his colleagues in the shop - anti-Stalinists. This is a whole galaxy of historians who are looking for documents that, at least indirectly, can confirm the blackest versions that discredit Stalin. In recent years, the versions themselves have been thrown to us from the West, more often from the USA. But even the local masters of compromising evidence did not think of parricide. The playwright threw this idea into the minds of young people and rubs his hands in anticipation of generous political dividends.

- Today, he doesn’t even need to insure: Stalin’s grandson is trying in vain to sue Svanidze ...

What are you! Radzinsky secured himself. According to him, in 1976 he received in Paris a typewritten text of the diaries of a certain fuji, allegedly a childhood friend of Soso, that was the name of Stalin as a boy, and an ally Koby- this is the first pseudonym of Joseph Vissarionovich. All words from the author Radzinsky and attributed to this Fuji. And he is with Stalin everywhere and always: until October 1917, and during the October Revolution, and after it, and during the Civil War, and during the years of internal party struggle, and in the late 20s, and in the 30s . Fuji - in the same cell on the Lubyanka together with Bukharin, he is the organizer of a secret meeting between Stalin and Hitler, he controls the execution of Polish officers in Katyn ... And between these cases, Fuji manages to organize an illegal network of Soviet intelligence officers in the West - oh yes, Edward Stanislavovich! The youth brought up on the Hollywood Bond will easily believe in such nonsense. As a literary device, the device is not new, but Radzinsky insisted on the historicity of his offspring and only recently admitted in an interview that Fuji is "a collective image." And this is how he speaks about Stalin's father Beso and Keke's mother in “collective” Russian, I quote: “... he drank gloomily, terribly, quickly got drunk and instead of Georgian feast praise immediately got into a fight - anger burned this man. He was black, of medium height, thin, low-browed, wore a mustache and beard. Koba will be very similar to him ... The first years after marriage, Keke regularly gives birth, but the children die. In 1876, Mikhail died in the cradle, then George. Dead Soso brothers... Nature seems to oppose the birth of a child from a gloomy shoemaker.

But he is born, to the horror of all mankind. And then Fuji recalls what made him think about Stalin's patricide:

“We were already fourteen at the time. I distinctly remember his father's voice that day. I heard their usual squabble with their mother: - You want to make a bastard the Metropolitan! Determined to the seminary. No! He will go to work. I can't read or write, but I support you. - He grabbed her casket, which always stood under the icon ... A carved casket from her parental home. He raked out banknotes, crumpled them in his fist. - Put it on it's place. Not yours! You already drank yours. I earned these! - How do you talk to a man? What did you earn? P... I'm dead? ( Ottochie ed.) But she belongs to me too! They are already standing in the courtyard of the house near the bushes. Cursing, the father puts banknotes in his pocket ... She silently hit him in the groin with a strong fist. He bent over. And when he straightened up - in his hand, as always, a knife from his boot. But she still silently rushed at him, twisting her arm. And the knife flew into the bushes. Father sat on the ground and wept drunkenly: - I'll cut it anyway. Both you and him ... I noticed how Soso's figure rushed into the bushes. In ten days, Soso will tell Fuji that his father was allegedly killed in a drunken brawl. Only an inexperienced young reader, who, moreover, did not know the laws of Georgia at the beginning of the last century, will hardly believe these words, following Fujii: the playwright Radzinsky is a recognized professional.

Didn't work for security

- What then angered you the most?

The author's disregard for history in principle. This was fully manifested in his statement that Stalin was an agent of the tsarist secret police. That is, he surrendered his associates. This myth appeared at the turn of the 1920s - 1930s during the period of acute political struggle against Stalin. And he was repeatedly debunked. But at Khrushchev they again tried to revive him for a full-scale compromise of Joseph Vissarionovich at the XX Congress of the CPSU. They tried to convince the people that cooperation with the Okhrana was Stalin's greatest secret, because of which the repressions of 1937 allegedly began. He, they say, exterminated everyone who could know about his past as a paid provocateur. The American journalist was the first to publicly "expose" the leader Isaac Don Levin, author of the first detailed biography of Stalin, published in the West in 1931.

He made public the document, which must be quoted to the letter:

“Ministry of Internal Affairs Head of a special department of the Police Department July 12, 1913 No. 2898 Top secret Personally To the head of the Yenisei security department A.F. Zheleznyakov (Stamp "Yenisei security department") Vkh. №512

Dear Sovereign Alexei Fedorovich!

Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili-Stalin, who was administratively exiled to the Turukhansk Territory, was arrested in 1906 and gave valuable intelligence information to the head of the Tiflis provincial gendarmerie department. In 1908, the head of the Baku security department received a number of information from Stalin, and then, upon Stalin's arrival in Petersburg, Stalin became an agent of the Petersburg security department. Stalin's work was accurate, but fragmentary. After Stalin was elected to the Central Committee of the party in Prague, Stalin, upon his return to St. Petersburg, became in clear opposition to the government and completely cut off contact with the Okhrana. I inform you, dear sir, about what has been stated for personal considerations in the conduct of search work. Please accept my sincere assurances of our utmost respect. Eremin.

- And what's the catch?

Allegedly, in 1936, the Ministry of Internal Affairs discovered the original of this document, and it was handed over to Kosior And Yakiru, and from them got to the marshal Tukhachevsky and lay at the heart of the "Tukhachevsky conspiracy." However, this version is a bluff. Even the most ardent opponents of Stalin immediately met this fake with hostility. Famous Russian emigrant, meticulous historian Nikolai Vladislavovich Volsky, wrote to his friend, also an opponent of Stalin: “From a document put into circulation by Don Levin, ten kilometers away it smells so false that you just have to be blind or a fool not to notice it. Didn't the police department know that there was no "Yenisei security department", but there was a "Yenisei provincial gendarme department"? Captain Zheleznyakov really existed, but he was not the chief ... "

Volsky did not trust Don Levin for a number of other reasons. First, he knew that Levin was an old British intelligence agent! Secondly, I remembered that Iosif Dzhugashvili began to use the pseudonym Stalin only from January 1913, when he first signed Stalin's work “Marxism and the National Question”. And, as of 1906 and 1908, the secret police officers could not mention the agent as Dzhugashvili-Stalin - this is an absolute forgery. But suppose that by the summer of 1913 Eremin already accustomed to the pseudonym Stalin and simply reported to the authorities about the stages of cooperation of the obstinate agent. And here the “third” arises: in tsarist Russia, the police did not operate now with the generally accepted form of writing patronymics - in pre-revolutionary spelling, instead of Vissarionovich, they wrote Vissarionov, which meant that we are talking about the son of Vissarion. In January 1914, Stalin's letters from exile were intercepted by the tsarist secret police, and in all police documents on this occasion, Stalin was called "publicly supervised Joseph Vissarionov Dzhugashvili", and not Stalin at all.

Didn't meet Hitler

- Radzinsky insists on a secret meeting between Stalin and Hitler. What can you say to him?

According to the legends, Stalin and Hitler met three times. The first - in 1913, when both lived in the same city, in Vienna. The second time - allegedly in 1931 on the Black Sea coast. Both versions were so thoroughly broken that even Fuji-Radzinsky does not write about them. But the third legend - a secret meeting in Lviv on October 17, 1939 - was nevertheless pulled out of oblivion by the pop historian and playwright. I think for two reasons. Firstly, the director of the FBI launched it, but how can Edward Stanislavovich not support American intelligence? Secondly, he figured out how it could be done in time - he sent Stalin to Lvov by train, and back by plane.

So, writes Radzinsky, the US National Archives declassified the following document: “July 19, 1940. Personally and confidentially to respected Adolf Berl Jr., assistant secretary of state ... According to just received information from a confidential source of information, after the German and Russian invasion of Poland and its partition, Hitler and Stalin met secretly in Lvov on October 17, 1939.

At these secret negotiations, Hitler and Stalin signed a military agreement to replace the pact that had exhausted itself ... Sincerely yours J. Edgar Hoover».

With the sensational document, signed by the famous FBI chief, they were supposed to acquaint Roosevelt. And Radzinsky starts the game: “No, on October 16, Stalin was in his office in Moscow. And on October 17 he has a long list of visitors. I already wanted to leave my occupation, but still looked at October 18 ... There was no reception on this day! Stalin did not appear in the Kremlin! And it was not a weekend, a regular working day - Thursday. ... He is also absent all day on October 19, and only late in the evening at 20:25 returns to his office and begins to receive visitors. ... Did this meeting really take place? Secret meeting of the century! How can you write it! They sat opposite each other - leaders, earthly gods, so similar and so different. They swore eternal friendship, divided the world, and each thought how he would deceive the other ... "

Listened to a hereditary witch

- What again does not suit you?

Of all the possible versions - a man fell ill, secretly met with a woman, just allowed himself to rest once in his life - Radzinsky chooses the most awkward, but the most beneficial for all the haters of the Soviet country. And, citing the document, hides the most important thing from the reader behind the ellipsis. Hoover is obliged to report unexpected information, but he himself does not believe it. What he writes about: “... It is unlikely that Stalin and Hitler had a need for a personal meeting three weeks after the signing of the Treaty of Friendship with Germany in Moscow” ...

Let's leave politics for a second. With what woman could the leader secretly meet?

Well, at least with the famous Natalia Lvova. As a man who studied at the seminary, he knew about the existence of people endowed, as they say now, with paranormal abilities. And he knew that many intelligence agencies of the world resorted to their services. So I kind of asked Kirov find him a hereditary witch. Sergei Mironovich found Lvova - one of the close friends of the poetess Anna Akhmatova, which left a number of testimonies about the unusual possibilities of a friend. In 1930, Lvova moved to Moscow, where she was given a good apartment in the center. She carried out Stalin's secret orders, but which ones are still unknown. It is believed that she tracked attempts to make a metaphysical attempt on Stalin. And not without her influence, Stalin changed the date of his birth so that astrologers would not reveal his weaknesses and come up with methods of influencing his psyche. She also advised the leader on ways to protect against a possible psychic attack during business meetings. How her fate turned out, I was not interested.

- So where was Stalin on October 18, 1939?- According to archival documents - at a nearby dacha near the village of Volynskoye. But I’ll tell you what I did in about six months, when the stamp “top secret” will be removed from the materials.

At the mention of the name of STALIN today, passions immediately flare up. And 60 years after the death of Joseph Vissarionovich, we are trying to understand who this man was - a bloody tyrant who ruthlessly destroyed the elite of a giant empire, or a wise ruler whose name became a symbol of the power of the Soviet state and the Great Victory of its people over fascism. The playwright Edward RADZINSKY also decided to contribute to this dispute and published three books of a biographical novel about the leader in a year. We asked the historian Alexander DUGIN, who has worked in the archives for over 30 years, to evaluate the brainchild of the TV presenter.

- Alexander Nikolayevich, what surprised you the most about Radzinsky?
- Militant incompetence. And the fact that he is honest in his novel in only one thing - in pathological hatred of the individual Stalin. I'm not ashamed to even imagine Joseph Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili parricide. This slander is just the beginning of a three-headed monster novel Radzinsky. The author did not even think to back it up with facts, although he claims that he even had access to the presidential archive. But not a single state archive, including the KGB archive, has his signature on the records of the use of archival files. And without it, not a single folder will be given to anyone. Radzinsky simply used the achievements of his colleagues in the shop - anti-Stalinists. This is a whole galaxy of historians who are looking for documents that, at least indirectly, can confirm the blackest versions that discredit Stalin. In recent years, the versions themselves have been thrown to us from the West, more often from the USA. But even the local masters of compromising evidence did not think of parricide. The playwright threw this idea into the minds of young people and rubs his hands in anticipation of generous political dividends.

- Today, he doesn’t even need to insure: Stalin’s grandson is trying in vain to sue Svanidze ...
- What are you doing! Radzinsky secured himself. According to him, in 1976 he received in Paris a typewritten text of the diaries of a certain fuji, allegedly a childhood friend of Soso, that was the name of Stalin as a boy, and an ally Koby- this is the first pseudonym of Joseph Vissarionovich. All words from the author Radzinsky and attributed to this Fuji. And he is with Stalin everywhere and always: until October 1917, and during the October Revolution, and after it, and during the Civil War, and during the years of internal party struggle, and in the late 20s, and in the 30s . Fuji - in the same cell on the Lubyanka together with Bukharin, he is the organizer of a secret meeting between Stalin and Hitler, he controls the execution of Polish officers in Katyn ...
And between these cases, Fuji manages to organize an illegal network of Soviet intelligence officers in the West - oh yes, Edward Stanislavovich! The youth brought up on the Hollywood Bond will easily believe in such nonsense. As a literary device, the device is not new, but Radzinsky insisted on the historicity of his offspring and only recently admitted in an interview that Fuji is "a collective image." And this is how he speaks about Stalin's father Beso and Keke's mother in “collective” Russian, I quote: “... he drank gloomily, terribly, quickly got drunk and instead of Georgian feast praise immediately got into a fight - anger burned this man. He was black, of medium height, thin, low-browed, wore a mustache and beard. Koba will be very similar to him ... The first years after marriage, Keke regularly gives birth, but the children die. In 1876, Mikhail died in the cradle, then George. Dead Soso brothers... Nature seems to oppose the birth of a child from a gloomy shoemaker.

But he is born, to the horror of all mankind. And then Fuji recalls what made him think about Stalin's patricide:
“We were already fourteen at the time. I distinctly remember his father's voice that day. Heard their usual squabble with their mother:
- Metropolitan you want to make a bastard! Determined to the seminary. No! He will go to work. I can't read or write, but I support you. - He grabbed her casket, which always stood under the icon ... A carved casket from her parental home. He raked out banknotes, crumpled them in his fist.
- Put it on it's place. Not yours! You already drank yours. I earned these!
- How do you talk to a man? What did you earn? P... I'm dead? ( Ottochie ed.) But she belongs to me too!
They are already standing in the courtyard of the house near the bushes. Cursing, the father puts banknotes in his pocket ... She silently hit him in the groin with a strong fist. He bent over. And when he straightened up - in his hand, as always, a knife from his boot. But she still silently rushed at him, twisting her arm. And the knife flew into the bushes.
Father sat on the ground and wept drunkenly:
- I'll cut it anyway. Both you and his...
I noticed how Soso's figure rushed into the bushes.
In ten days, Soso will tell Fuji that his father was allegedly killed in a drunken brawl. Only an inexperienced young reader, who, moreover, did not know the laws of Georgia at the beginning of the last century, will hardly believe these words, following Fujii: the playwright Radzinsky is a recognized professional.

Didn't work for security

- What then angered you the most?
- The author's disregard for history in principle. This was fully manifested in his statement that Stalin was an agent of the tsarist secret police. That is, he surrendered his associates.
This myth appeared at the turn of the 1920s - 1930s during the period of acute political struggle against Stalin. And he was repeatedly debunked. But at Khrushchev they again tried to revive him for a full-scale compromise of Joseph Vissarionovich at the XX Congress of the CPSU. They tried to convince the people that cooperation with the Okhrana was Stalin's greatest secret, because of which the repressions of 1937 allegedly began. He, they say, exterminated everyone who could know about his past as a paid provocateur. The American journalist was the first to publicly "expose" the leader Isaac Don Levin, author of the first detailed biography of Stalin, published in the West in 1931.

He made public the document, which must be quoted to the letter:

“Ministry of Internal Affairs Head of a special department of the Police Department July 12, 1913 No. 2898 Top secret Personally To the head of the Yenisei security department A.F. Zheleznyakov (Stamp "Yenisei security department") Vkh. №512
July 23, 1913

Dear Sovereign Alexei Fedorovich!
Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili-Stalin, who was administratively exiled to the Turukhansk Territory, was arrested in 1906 and gave valuable intelligence information to the head of the Tiflis provincial gendarmerie department. In 1908, the head of the Baku security department received a number of information from Stalin, and then, upon Stalin's arrival in Petersburg, Stalin became an agent of the Petersburg security department.
Stalin's work was accurate, but fragmentary. After Stalin was elected to the Central Committee of the party in Prague, Stalin, upon his return to St. Petersburg, became in clear opposition to the government and completely cut off contact with the Okhrana.
I inform you, dear sir, about what has been stated for personal considerations in the conduct of search work.
Please accept my sincere assurances of our utmost respect.
Eremin.

- And what's the catch?
- Allegedly in 1936, the Ministry of Internal Affairs discovered the original of this document, and it was handed over Kosior And Yakiru, and from them got to the marshal Tukhachevsky and lay at the heart of the "Tukhachevsky conspiracy." However, this version is a bluff. Even the most ardent opponents of Stalin immediately met this fake with hostility. Famous Russian emigrant, meticulous historian Nikolai Vladislavovich Volsky, wrote to his friend, also an opponent of Stalin: “From a document put into circulation by Don Levin, ten kilometers away it smells so false that you just have to be blind or a fool not to notice it. Didn't the police department know that there was no "Yenisei security department", but there was a "Yenisei provincial gendarme department"? Captain Zheleznyakov really existed, but he was not the chief ... "

Volsky did not trust Don Levin for a number of other reasons. First, he knew that Levin was an old British intelligence agent! Secondly, I remembered that Iosif Dzhugashvili began to use the pseudonym Stalin only from January 1913, when he first signed Stalin's work “Marxism and the National Question”. And, as of 1906 and 1908, the secret police officers could not mention the agent as Dzhugashvili-Stalin - this is an absolute forgery. But suppose that by the summer of 1913 Eremin already accustomed to the pseudonym Stalin and simply reported to the authorities about the stages of cooperation of the obstinate agent. And here the “third” arises: in tsarist Russia, the police did not operate now with the generally accepted form of writing patronymics - in pre-revolutionary spelling, instead of Vissarionovich, they wrote Vissarionov, which meant that we are talking about the son of Vissarion. In January 1914, Stalin's letters from exile were intercepted by the tsarist secret police, and in all police documents on this occasion, Stalin was called "publicly supervised Joseph Vissarionov Dzhugashvili", and not Stalin at all.

Didn't meet Hitler

- Radzinsky insists on a secret meeting between Stalin and Hitler. What can you say to him?
- According to the legends, Stalin and Hitler met three times. The first - in 1913, when both lived in the same city, in Vienna. The second time - allegedly in 1931 on the Black Sea coast. Both versions were so thoroughly broken that even Fuji-Radzinsky does not write about them. But the third legend - a secret meeting in Lviv on October 17, 1939 - was nevertheless pulled out of oblivion by the pop historian and playwright. I think for two reasons. Firstly, the director of the FBI launched it, but how can Edward Stanislavovich not support American intelligence? Secondly, he figured out how it could be done in time - he sent Stalin to Lvov by train, and back by plane.
So, writes Radzinsky, the US National Archives has declassified the following document:
July 19, 1940. Personally and confidentially to respected Adolf Berl Jr., assistant secretary of state ... According to just received information from a confidential source of information, after the German and Russian invasion of Poland and its partition, Hitler and Stalin met secretly in Lvov on October 17, 1939.

At these secret negotiations, Hitler and Stalin signed a military agreement to replace the pact that had exhausted itself ... Sincerely yours J. Edgar Hoover».
With the sensational document, signed by the famous FBI chief, they were supposed to acquaint Roosevelt. And Radzinsky starts the game:
“No, on October 16 Stalin was in his office in Moscow. And on October 17 he has a long list of visitors. I already wanted to leave my occupation, but still looked at October 18 ... There was no reception on this day! Stalin did not appear in the Kremlin! And it was not a weekend, a regular working day - Thursday. ... He is also absent all day on October 19, and only late in the evening at 20:25 returns to his office and begins to receive visitors. ... Did this meeting really take place? Secret meeting of the century! How can you write it! They sat opposite each other - leaders, earthly gods, so similar and so different. They swore eternal friendship, divided the world, and each thought how he would deceive the other ... "

Listened to a hereditary witch

- What again does not suit you?
- Of all the possible versions - a man fell ill, secretly met with a woman, just once in his life he allowed himself to rest - Radzinsky chooses the most awkward, but most beneficial to all the haters of the Soviet country. And, citing the document, hides the most important thing from the reader behind the ellipsis. Hoover is obliged to report unexpected information, but he himself does not believe it. What he writes about: “... It is unlikely that Stalin and Hitler had a need for a personal meeting three weeks after the signing of the Treaty of Friendship with Germany in Moscow” ...

Let's leave politics for a second. With what woman could the leader secretly meet?
- Well, at least with the famous Natalia Lvova. As a man who studied at the seminary, he knew about the existence of people endowed, as they say now, with paranormal abilities. And he knew that many intelligence agencies of the world resorted to their services. So I kind of asked Kirov find him a hereditary witch. Sergei Mironovich found Lvova - one of the close friends of the poetess Anna Akhmatova, which left a number of testimonies about the unusual possibilities of a friend. In 1930, Lvova moved to Moscow, where she was given a good apartment in the center. She carried out Stalin's secret orders, but which ones are still unknown. It is believed that she tracked attempts to make a metaphysical attempt on Stalin. And not without her influence, Stalin changed the date of his birth so that astrologers would not reveal his weaknesses and come up with methods of influencing his psyche. She also advised the leader on ways to protect against a possible psychic attack during business meetings. How her fate turned out, I was not interested.
- So where was Stalin on October 18, 1939?
- According to archival documents - at a nearby dacha near the village of Volynskoye. But I’ll tell you what I did in about six months, when the stamp “top secret” will be removed from the materials.

* * *

Coming from the poor, Nikolai knew the need from childhood. Nikolai spent his childhood years in his native village, where he lived until 1933. Then the Dugin family moved to the village of Kolonets. He studied at the Udelninskaya secondary school of the Ramensky district. After graduating from the 7th grade of a rural school, he left for the city of Lyubertsy, where he entered the FZU school, and then to the evening department of the engineering college at the plant named after A.V. Ukhtomsky. At the same time he worked as a technician-experimenter at TsAGI.

In the 2nd year, together with his comrades, he enrolled in the Ramensky flying club. This abruptly changed the fate of Nikolai. After graduating from the flying club in April 1940, he was drafted into the Red Army and became a cadet at the Kachin Military Aviation Pilot School. And time became more and more alarming: the fire of the Second World War flared up. And the cadets felt that, despite the non-aggression pact with Germany, a fight with fascism could not be avoided.

In the spring of 1941, the next graduation of fighter pilots took place at the aviation school. Dugin and his friends hoped to get to serve in the European part of the country in order, if necessary, to meet the enemy in the forefront. But the young pilots, much to their dismay, were sent to the Far East. There were large forces of Soviet troops opposing the Kwantung Army, concentrated in Manchuria near our borders.

Conscious of the importance of his stay in the Far East, foreman Dugin nevertheless strove to go where the war was already raging with might and main. With great joy he received the news of the defeat of the German - fascist hordes under the walls of his native Moscow and Stalingrad. Finally, almost 2 years after the start of the war, his hour also struck. In the spring of 1943, the 402nd Air Regiment became part of the 3rd Fighter Air Corps of the High Command Reserve (commander Major General of Aviation E. Ya. Savitsky), which was transferred to the Kuban.

Fighter Yak-1 of one of the aviation regiments of the 3rd IAK RGK. Kuban, spring 1943.

By that time, on the Taman Peninsula, the enemy, retreating from the Caucasus, had created a heavily fortified and deeply echeloned defense line, the so-called Blue Line, whose flanks rested on the Azov and Black Seas. The Germans hoped to take revenge for the defeat at Stalingrad and concentrated a large group of troops and selected air formations in this direction. Stubborn battles for air supremacy unfolded, in which the pilots of the 3rd IAK immediately joined.

On April 20, 1943, fighters of the 402nd IAP covered the Il-2 group, which flew out to attack enemy infantry and artillery combat formations in front of the positions of the airborne detachment holding a bridgehead on the Myskhako Peninsula near Novorossiysk. On the approach to the target, the crews came under heavy fire from enemy anti-aircraft artillery. Having overcome the curtain of fire, the attack aircraft first bombed, and then carried out several attacks, using eres and airborne weapons. The enemy suffered heavy losses in manpower and equipment.

The successful fulfillment of the combat mission by the attack aircraft was ensured by the clear and well-coordinated actions of the cover group, which resolutely and skillfully repelled all attempts by fascist fighters to attack our Ilas. In a stubborn battle, the pilots of the 402nd Air Regiment destroyed 9 Messers, one of which was shot down by Lieutenant N.D. Dugin. The first day of stay at the front and the first victory. And others followed. For military successes, courage and bravery shown in air battles, the corps commander General E. Ya. Savitsky, by order of April 25, awarded the young pilot the Order of the Patriotic War of the 2nd degree.

The first successes and the award strengthened Nikolai's self-confidence, but did not turn his head. But in the regiment, often because of unfortunate miscalculations, fervor and passion, good pilots, young and healthy guys, died. The bitterness of losses forced Dugin to learn from senior highly experienced comrades, to consult with them, to adopt tactics proven in battles. Gradually, a cold-blooded air fighter was formed from him, who fought with the enemy boldly and prudently.

The command of the regiment increasingly began to send the Lieutenant on independent missions and reconnaissance. In a relatively short time in the active army, Nikolai Dugin went through a glorious military path and rose from an ordinary pilot to deputy squadron commander.

So, on September 18, 1943, on the Southern Front, he and the leading Major G.S. Balashov flew out on a "free hunt". In the Gulyai-Polya area (Zaporozhye region), the pilots met 15 He-111 bombers, flying in the direction of our front line, accompanied by 6 Me-109. The host commanded: "Nikolai, I'm attacking, cover!" Having stunned the enemy with a surprise attack, the "hunters" immediately shot down 2 aircraft: Balashov - "Heinkel", and Dugin - "Messer". The enemy formation crumbled. The bombers hurriedly freed themselves from the bombs and turned back. The fighters also left the battlefield. However, Soviet pilots began to pursue them. Nikolai on his "Yak" caught up with one and turned it into a torch in several bursts, which fell into the floodplains.

In the early days of February 1944, a pair of pilots from the 402nd Fighter Aviation Regiment, led by Second Lieutenant Sh. M. Abdrashitov, discovered at one of the airfields a cluster of up to 200 enemy transport aircraft. For the attack, 2 groups of fighters were sent, which were led by the squadron commander Lieutenant V. A. Egorovich and his deputy Senior Lieutenant O. P. Makarov. In the ensuing air battle on the outskirts of the airfield, our pilots shot down 2 Me-109s, and then set fire to several aircraft on the ground. Lieutenants Sh. M. Abdrashitov, S. V. Ivanov and one Major A. U. Eremin, Captain G. S. Balashov, Lieutenants A. I. Volchkov, N. D. Dugin, V. A. Egorovich and M. E. Pivovarov.

In fierce air battles in Northern Tavria, Crimea, Belarus, Lithuania and Poland, Dugin's character was tempered, the number of victories he won over the enemy grew. In mid-February 1945, the commander of the 402nd Fighter Aviation Regiment, Major A.E. Rubakhin, introduced the deputy squadron commander, Captain N.D. Dugin, to the title of Hero of the Soviet Union. By that time, he had flown 325 sorties and personally shot down 14 enemy vehicles in 77 air battles. With assault strikes, he destroyed 6 aircraft, 3 steam locomotives, 14 cars and 10 wagons with goods, several dozen enemy soldiers and officers on the ground.

During the days of the storming of Berlin, Captain N.D. Dugin led groups of fighters into battle, stormed enemy troops and equipment, and paved the way for Soviet infantry and tanks. He shot down the last fascist plane on April 20, 1945.

Early in the morning of May 2, 1945, a few hours before the surrender of the remnants of the Berlin garrison, about 3,000 enemy soldiers and officers with tanks and self-propelled guns broke out of the encirclement in the Spandau region and moved westward. On the route of this distraught grouping was the Dalgov airfield, which housed the 402nd air regiment. Anti-aircraft gunners, aviation mechanics, minders, staff officers entered the battle with the enemy. Our pilots managed to relocate to the Werneuchen airfield and took off to attack the enemy from there.

In a fierce battle, Nikolai Dugin especially distinguished himself. In one of the attacks, he was seriously wounded. Bleeding, the pilot nevertheless found the strength to land the damaged aircraft and died in the cockpit in front of the mechanics who ran up. And only 7 days left until Victory Day ...

By that time, Nikolai had completed 424 sorties. After 84 air battles, he personally shot down 16 aircraft and 1 spotter balloon.

By the Decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR of May 15, 1946, for the exemplary performance of combat missions of the command on the front of the fight against the Nazi invaders and the courage and heroism shown at the same time, the deputy squadron commander of the 402nd Fighter Aviation Regiment of the 265th Fighter Aviation Division, Captain Dugin Nikolai Dmitrievich was posthumously awarded the title of Hero of the Soviet Union.

He was buried in a military cemetery near the Hamburg highway on the southern outskirts of the Dahlgov settlement (Nauen district, Brandenburg, Germany). The erroneous year of the Hero's birth is stamped on the monument.

The name of the Hero is inscribed on one of the marble slabs near the bronze monument to Soviet soldiers in Berlin who fell during the storming of the city. His memory lives on in his native land. On Victory Square in the city of Ramenskoye, near the Eternal Flame, a granite slab was installed on which the name of the Hero was carved. A street in the city of Zhukovsky, Moscow Region, is named after him.

By order of the Minister of Defense of the USSR dated August 18, 1985, Hero of the Soviet Union Captain N.D. Dugin was forever enrolled in the lists of personnel of the military unit.

* * *

List of all known victories of Captain N. D. Dugin:
(From the book by M. Yu. Bykov - "Victory of Stalin's falcons". Publishing house "YAUZA - EKSMO", 2008.)

№ n / n	Date	Downed aircraft	Place of air combat (winning)	Their aircraft
1	04/21/1943	1 Me-109	Novorossiysk	Yak-1, Yak-9, Yak-3.
2	04/23/1943	1 Me-109	Novorossiysk
3	04/30/1943	1 Me-109	Crimean
4	May 27, 1943	1 Me-109	Kyiv
5	09/14/1943	1 Non-111	Yekaterinovka
6	09/18/1943	1 Me-109	Walk - Field
7	09/27/1943	1 Hs-129	ostentatious
8	November 27, 1943	1 Ju-87	Osokaryovka
9	01/30/1944	1 Me-109	Tarkhan
10	04/17/1944	1 Me-109	south Sarabuz
11	05/07/1944	1 FW-190	sowing Janshiev
12	08/06/1944	1 FW-190	southwest Wojigry
13	03/05/1945	1 FW-190	sowing - app. Stargard
14		1 balloon	Neuenhagen
15	03/09/1945	1 Me-109	sowing - east. Garden
16	04/18/1945	1 FW-190	Art. Reichenberg
17	04/20/1945	1 FW-190	sowing Vernoyhe
Total downed aircraft - 16 + 0 (and 1 observation balloon); sorties - 424.

January 1955 was the beginning of the "black" mythologizing of Soviet history and the peak of Nikita Khrushchev's struggle for sole power. His main competitor, Lavrenty BERIA, was already accused of treason, shot and became such a scapegoat that the Soviet Encyclopedic Dictionary soon even stopped mentioning his name.

Although in the famous Khrushchev report on the personality cult of STALIN, it is named 61 times along with the name of the leader. Many researchers were convinced that Nikita Sergeevich not only slandered prominent statesmen, but also contributed to their death. But they could not scientifically prove their versions. Recently discovered archival materials allowed the historian Alexander DUGIN to document Khrushchev's lie for the first time.

- Alexander Nikolaevich, what new did you find in the archive?

I went to the Russian State Archive of Socio-Political History to see what documents on the history of the 1950s were transferred to RGASPI from the archive of the President of the Russian Federation. And I discovered a lot of interesting things. First, confirmation of the words of Valentin Falin - he prepared analytical notes for all the leaders of the country from Stalin to Yeltsin. Wrote Khrushchev's foreign policy speeches. And in 2011, he ventured to publicly declare that Khrushchev, wanting to seize archival documents about his participation in repressions, ordered the creation of a group of 200 special officers not only to seize genuine documents, but also to make fakes. Secondly, I discovered these fakes in the "Beria case" and realized that among the forgers there were honest officers who left "beacons" for the descendants to recognize the fake.

- What are the "beacons"?

There are several.

In any case of high treason, of which Khrushchev accused Beria, according to the then Code of Criminal Procedure, there must be photographs of the defendants in the case, their fingerprints, protocols of confrontations. But in the materials of the “Beria case” there is not a single photograph of him, not a single fingerprint, not a single protocol of confrontations with any of his “accomplices”.

In addition, there is not a single signature of Beria himself on the interrogation protocols, nor is there a single signature of the investigator of the Prosecutor General's Office for the most important cases of Tsaregradsky. There is only the signature of the major of the administrative service Yuryeva. And on many protocols of interrogation of Beria there are no obligatory clerical "litters": the initials of the typist-performer, the number of printed copies, mailing addressees, etc. But all of the above are just outward signs of a fake.

- And were there internal signs of forgery?

Certainly. On one of the handwritten "originals" of Beria's letters, allegedly written by him when he was already under arrest, there is the date "June 28, 1953", literally screaming "do not believe it!". You can find it at the link: RGASPI, f.17, op.171, d. 463, l.163.

- What exactly "do not believe"?

The letter is addressed to "To the Central Committee of the CPSU, Comrade Malenkov." In it, Beria speaks of his devotion to the cause of the party and asks his comrades-in-arms - Malenkov, Molotov, Voroshilov, Khrushchev, Kaganovich, Bulganin and Mikoyan: "let them forgive if anything went wrong during these fifteen years of great and intense joint work."

And wishes them great success in the struggle for the cause of Lenin-Stalin. In tone, it resembles a note to friends and colleagues written by a person who is going on vacation or who decides to lie down at home for a couple of days because of a cold. And it begins like this: “I was sure that from that big criticism at the Presidium I would draw all the necessary conclusions for myself and be useful in the team. But the Central Committee decided otherwise, I think that the Central Committee did the right thing. After reading this, I was almost speechless!

The fact is that neither before nor after the death of Stalin, Beria was not subjected to any “big criticism” at any meetings of the Presidium. The first meeting of the Presidium of the Central Committee of the CPSU, at which serious accusations of anti-state and anti-party actions of Beria suddenly sounded, as you know, took place on June 29, 1953. That is, the day after this letter from Beria's cell.

- Are you a little speechless because of the date?

Yes. If the letter had been genuine, it would have dismissed the version of a number of my colleagues, which I shared one hundred percent. The fact that Beria was killed at noon on June 26, 1953 in his mansion on Kachalova Street, now Malaya Nikitskaya.

- Killed by whom?

- A special group sent to Lavrenty Pavlovich by order of Khrushchev by Beria's first deputy for the Ministry of State Security, Sergei Kruglov. Lieutenant General Andrey Vedenin, a former commander of a rifle corps who became commandant of the Kremlin in September 1953, described how his unit was ordered to carry out Operation Mansion to eliminate Beria. And how it was performed. Then the corpse of Beria was taken to the Kremlin and presented to the members of the Presidium of the Central Committee of the CPSU. After such a “face-to-face confrontation”, the Khrushchevites could, without fear, at the Plenum of the Central Committee on July 2-7, 1953, accuse Beria of all mortal sins. Win five months to clean up the archives to destroy the traces of their crimes.

And inspire the people with the official version of Khrushchev: they say, the former Minister of Internal Affairs of the USSR, ex-Deputy Chairman of the State Defense Committee and a member of the Stalinist Politburo was shot for treason on December 23, 1953 by court order. And with Beria alive, Khrushchev could not have concealed the poisoning of Stalin and his complicity in this crime, which I have already spoken about in detail. Let me remind you, in my opinion, in this double murder - first of Stalin, then of Beria - two people were most interested in this. The first was the Minister of State Security in 1951-1953, Semyon Ignatiev, to whom Stalin had serious questions in connection with a number of scandalous trials initiated by this man. Including in the "case of doctors" and the murder of Kirov. On March 2, 1953, the Presidium of the Central Committee was already supposed to consider the issue of removing Ignatiev from office. The second interested person is Khrushchev, the curator of Ignatiev, who since 1946 held the most important post of deputy head of the Directorate of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks for checking party bodies and carried out all repressions against the leadership of the party and the state. In the event of the failure of his ward, Khrushchev would also have thundered to the fanfare. At 10:30 p.m. on March 1, Stalin was found unconscious on the floor. After his death, Beria went through Stalin's archive and, studying the history of his illness, could suspect the named couple.

There was a doppelgänger in jail.

What exactly was Stalin poisoned with?

Commenting on the medical data published in the recently published book by Sigismund Mironin “How Stalin was poisoned. Forensic medical examination”, the chief toxicologist of Moscow, Honored Doctor of Russia Yuri Ostapenko said that the leader was probably poisoned with pills with an increased dose of a drug that reduces blood clotting. Since 1940, dicoumarin has been the first and main representative of anticoagulants; in case of vascular problems and thrombosis, it was recommended to use it in small doses constantly, as aspirin is today. However, due to its high toxicity, it was withdrawn from use at the end of the last century.

Prophylactically drink it once a day, in the afternoon. The laboratories of the NKVD-NKGB-MGB did not cost anything to make tablets with an increased dosage and put them in regular packaging. After all, Ignatiev himself oversaw Stalin's personal protection.

But someone had to see Beria alive in the cell to confirm the version that he spent five months in prison, waiting to be shot?

He had several doppelgangers. And, mind you, there are funds of Molotov, Zhdanov and a number of other addressees of Beria's "letters" in the public domain, but there are still no funds of Khrushchev and Beria. And in the official collection "The Politburo and the Case of Beria" there is not a single documented fact that could be qualified as treason. But I managed to find an important document from Stalin's personal archive. He confirms that Khrushchev, accusing Beria of voluntary service in the Musavat counterintelligence, which fought against the labor movement in Azerbaijan, knew perfectly well that he was blatantly lying. This document, dated November 20, 1920, reports that Beria was introduced into the counterintelligence censorship department on the instructions of the Azerbaijani Communist Party. It was requested from the Stalin archive for the last time in July 1953, when the “Beria case” was fabricated. But for obvious reasons, he was not attached to it.

The body was filled with concrete.

- Have you made sure that the “letters from the cell” are fake?

Yes sir. I took them to an independent handwriting examination. Mikhail Strakhov, the chief specialist of RGASPI, helped me find the original handwriting of Beria. To keep everything clean and honest, I chose lines from which it is impossible to understand who is writing to whom, and paid for the examination out of my own pocket so that no one could influence its result. According to experts, the samples presented by me were written by different people.

And this conclusion confirms that the massacre of Beria occurred due to the fact that, having taken the post of head of the combined Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Ministry of State Security, he was looking for an answer to the question of the true causes of Stalin's death. If he had remained alive, there would have been no talk of any revelations of the personality cult of Iosif Vissarionovich at the height of the Cold War. And in 1961, when Norwegian biochemists analyzed Napoleon's hair on the order of the French government and found out that he was poisoned with arsenic, no one would urgently convene an extraordinary congress of the CPSU. And he did not raise the unexpected question of removing Stalin's body from the Mausoleum and its concreting. Khrushchev covered his tracks!

- Why do you care so deeply about this whole story?

I decided to do this, because I can’t calmly watch how the heroes of the Frikopedia like Rezun-Suvorov and Radzinsky try to erase all the positive moments of Soviet history from people’s memory, painting it only in dirty tones. And man, especially a young man who despises the past of his country cannot respect his present and build his future in a state where his father, grandfather, great-grandfather are exposed as cattle.